|
colorado pols
Thu Aug 05, 2010 at 18:56:12 PM MST
|
So I just looked at a recent comment by Colorado Pols in Raf's diary.
As for debunking the Romanoff "disadvantage"
Any disadvantage he had in this Primary was his own doing. We discussed this many times in the last 18 months. Nobody forced Romanoff to wait until August to announce his candidacy, by which time he was already millions of dollars behind in fundraising. He could have jumped in the race in March, when he first polled on it, and it would have made a huge difference.
by: Colorado Pols @ Thu Aug 05, 2010 at 18:04:00 PM MDT
[ Parent | Reply ]
http://www.coloradopols.com/di...
To which I replied:
nice try Colorado Pols
but I was there in September when Colorado Pols (said)
http://www.coloradopols.com/di...
Bennet Scramble to Show Democratic Bonafides Too Little, Too Late
by: Colorado Pols
Tue Sep 01, 2009 at 14:10:43 PM MDT
Sure, Bennet has raised a ton of money, but in a Democratic primary where Romanoff will start with significantly greater name ID, the latter needs only to be able to raise enough money to be competitive. Romanoff doesn't need to outspend Bennet, or even come close, because he is so much more well-known and liked among Democratic primary voters.
You can see that Colorado Pols has clearly supported the idea that Romanoff both had better name ID and 'likability' with Democrats and that this was more important than money. "Romanoff doesn't need to outspend Bennet, or even come close" the editors said.
This was not 18 months ago, but 11 months ago. And furthermore, the credibility gap for Colorado Pols goes back even further.
http://www.coloradopols.com/di...
While we are at it, let's look at all of the Bennet bashing was doing before they took a complete 180 on the Senate Primary.
|
|
There's More...
:: (9
Comments, 821 words in story)
|
|
Wed Aug 04, 2010 at 12:45:15 PM MST
|
( - promoted by Fong)
First, as a former frequent poster on that other political blog (TOPB, from now on), and soon-to-be frequent poster on this one, I thought I'd start with a little introduction of myself as a blogger. One thing that is a bit different about my approach is that I am more focused on fundamental principles, systemic structure and dynamics, and, in general, overarching abstractions, than I am on the particular vessels and driftwood floating on their currents. Some of my posts frame typical political fodder in this way, and some don't get to the fodder at all.
I'm writing that disclaimer because this diary, for the most part, is of the latter variety. It's not about the hot events of the day, the battling candidates, the particular policy proposals in the pipeline, but rather about an overarching principle, one which we forget in the heat of our passions and the hunger of our will.
|
|
There's More...
:: (16
Comments, 706 words in story)
|
|
|
|
Squarestate.net is owned by Open Communications Colorado, LLC. and is not responsible for the opinions expressed outside of our own.
|
|
SquareState.net is owned by Open Communications Colorado, LLC