|
climate change
|
|
Tue Jan 03, 2012 at 10:51:11 AM MST
|
|
In July, I wrote a post that laid the groundwork for the discussion of climate change basics: Gases, Forcing & Surface Temperature. This post follows onto that initial post by discussing energy within Earth's climate system. As in that post, I will focus on the results in the IPCC's AR4. There is a wealth of additional results in the scientific literature since the 2007 Report and I will share some of those in future posts. In other words, the IPCC information will be used as a baseline. This post is a little long, but I think it's worth reading in its entirety.
Energy Content
First, here are two views of the energy content in the climate system. The first is from the IPCC's WGI Technical Summary:
Source: IPCC AR4 Figure TS.15. Energy content changes in different components of the Earth for two periods (1961-2003 (blue) and 1993-2003 (burgundy)).
|
|
There's More...
:: (0
Comments, 1440 words in story)
|
|
Wed Dec 14, 2011 at 10:36:46 AM MST
|
|
I haven't written about polar ice conditions for a few months due to lack of time thanks to school. Hopefully my time availability moving forward will be high enough to keep this series going.
The state of global polar sea ice area in early December 2011 has temporarily returned to near climatologically normal conditions (1979-2009). Arctic sea ice has recovered very quickly after starting the freeze season slowly and Antarctic sea ice is benefiting from weather conditions preventing extensive melt at the edges in much the same way as it did last year at the same time. Since my last post (covering August conditions), polar sea ice has generally recovered from an extensive deficit of negative 2 million sq. km. The long time that sea ice area spent near this dramatic condition is unprecedented in the modern era. Poor conditions established this development across the Arctic this year.
|
|
There's More...
:: (1
Comments, 1226 words in story)
|
|
Fri Nov 04, 2011 at 12:44:32 PM MST
|
|
I wanted to share just a few brief words on an article I saw in the Denver Post (from the AP) today: Greenhouse gas levels rise. Somewhat surprisingly, a reference to the article appeared on the top of the front page of the print edition of the paper. The story, at the back on 11A, was a little too filled with various quotes from experts in the field for my taste, with no real context for readers to grasp why the news is so important.
This graph encapsulates the importance of this news item:
What this graph shows is the observations of emissions (as calculated by the IEA) represented by the black curve and 5 of the 6 emissions scenarios used by the IPCC AR4 in colored lines. The SRES begin in 2000, which was the starting year used for future simulations in the AR4. You can clearly see the effects of the partial collapse of the global economy in 2009 emissions: they went from higher than the worst-case scenario to the middle of the pack.
In 2010, however, emissions jumped back up to the top of the pack, almost as if 2009 never even happened. I would be willing to bet the 2011 numbers will demonstrate a further increase.
|
|
There's More...
:: (7
Comments, 238 words in story)
|
|
Thu Sep 08, 2011 at 21:28:34 PM MST
|
|
While Colorado's weather this summer shifted from warm to wet to hot, it was plain and simply nothing but hot, hot, and hot in the states to our south. How hot was it?
It was so hot that Texas and Oklahoma set the U.S. record for the 1st and 2nd hottest summers: 86.8F and 86.5F, respectively, beating out Oklahoma's 1934 record (set during the Dust Bowl years) of 85.2F. To be clear, from June through August, the average of all the temperatures taken at the top of every hour came out to above 86 degrees. Oh, Louisiana's 2011 summer now ranks 4th warmest all-time at 84.5F.
When records from the previous hottest period in the nation's history are falling, it's time to pay attention. Instead of natural variability playing the primary role, the heat wave this year has been boosted by the altered background state.
|
|
There's More...
:: (0
Comments, 408 words in story)
|
|
Thu Aug 18, 2011 at 08:01:42 AM MST
|
I'd bet a good number of metro area folks have heard the forecast for today: HOT! The record high of 98F for the day will likely be challenged. Here is the official forecast discussion from the Denver-Boulder NWS office this morning (sorry for the all-caps, it's what the NWS text products actually look like):
SHORT TERM...A HOT AND DRY DAY IS IN STORE FOR THE FORECAST AREA TODAY WITH RECORD OR NEAR RECORD HEAT. THE UPPER LEVEL RIDGE WILL AMPLIFY A BIT OVER THE STATE WITH WARMER TEMPERATURES ALOFT. MOST SHORT RANGE MODEL GUIDANCE SHOWS 2-3C OF WARMING ACROSS NORTHEAST COLORADO FROM 24 HOURS AGO. AT THE SAME TIME...THE AIRMASS WILL BE DRYING AND THIS HAS ALREADY COMMENCED PER THE LATEST GPS INTEGRATED PRECIPITABLE WATER DATA. THIS ALL SUPPORTS RECORD OR NEAR RECORD HEAT. DENVERS RECORD IS 98F SET IN 1986...AND AT THIS POINT SEE NO REASON WE SHOULDNT AT LEAST TIE THIS RECORD GIVEN THE ABOVE MENTIONED FACTORS. THERE IS A SLIGHT RISK WE COULD REACH 100F...AND IF WE DID THAT WOULD BE THE LATEST IN THE SEASON A 100F DEGREE READING HAS BEEN OBSERVED. THE LATEST RECORDED 100F WAS ON AUGUST 16TH IN 2002.
|
|
There's More...
:: (3
Comments, 206 words in story)
|
|
Tue Aug 09, 2011 at 15:52:17 PM MST
|
|
Thanks to global cooling (not!), the eastern 3/4 of the U.S. was much warmer than normal in July 2011. In fact, Oklahoma set a record for the warmest month of any state in American history: an average of 88.9F. Which kind of makes sense, when you think about it. After all, it was the preeminent expert on climate, Sen. Jim Inhofe (R TB-OK), whose grandchildren built an igloo on the National Mall back in February 2010 - because mocking Al Gore is the top responsibility of a sitting U.S. Senator. Maybe his family should have spent less time making fun of things they can't or don't want to understand but more time praying for rain this summer. In the end, the solution is simple: stop polluting heat-trapping gases and the atmosphere will trap less heat! Imagine that!
Back to the state of U.S. climate in July 2011.
July 2011 was the fourth warmest July in NOAA's records: 77F. It was the fourth warmest month all time. Here is what that looks like graphically:
|
|
There's More...
:: (6
Comments, 422 words in story)
|
|
Sat Jul 30, 2011 at 17:32:28 PM MST
|
The President is proving once again that he is much better than his predecessor George Bush as a President - When it comes to getting to more oil in pristine environments and silencing critics and whistleblowers.
It was seen as one of the most distressing effects of climate change ever recorded: polar bears dying of exhaustion after being stranded between melting patches of Arctic sea ice.
But now the government scientist who first warned of the threat to polar bears in a warming Arctic has been suspended and his work put under official investigation for possible scientific misconduct.
Charles Monnett, a wildlife biologist, oversaw much of the scientific work for the government agency that has been examining drilling in the Arctic. He managed about $50m (£30.5m) in research projects.
Some question why Monnett, employed by the US Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement, has been suspended at this moment. The Obama administration has been accused of hounding the scientist so it can open up the fragile region to drilling by Shell and other big oil companies.
|
|
There's More...
:: (3
Comments, 800 words in story)
|
|
Thu Jul 21, 2011 at 10:05:18 AM MST
|
|
According to data released by NASA and NOAA this month, June 2011 ranked among the top 10 warmest Junes on record: NASA recorded the 8th warmest June in its dataset; NOAA recorded the 7th warmest June in its dataset. The two agencies have slightly different analysis techniques, which actually helps to reinforce the results from each other.
|
|
There's More...
:: (0
Comments, 423 words in story)
|
|
Fri Jul 15, 2011 at 10:55:05 AM MST
|
|
Among other energy-related news, Canadian tar sands oil has maintained a relatively low profile, even in American environmental circles. That's dangerously short-sighted. As I've argued against overt climate change denialism, it seems some groups closer to my worldview need some education and encouragement to do the correct thing.
The U.S. State Department apparently has been working to alleviate concerns of parties in Canada interested in transporting tar sands oil from Alberta to U.S. Gulf Coast refineries. This wouldn't change the balance of what gets processed in the U.S. very much, but one of the arguments for doing this would be to decrease the amount of oil processed from unstable regions (i.e. the Middle East). The U.S. State Department, in 2009, helped work on this and other messaging for pro-dirty energy interests. That would be the Obama State Department, headed by Hillary Clinton. Obama has taken some actions which can be characterized as good in dealing with the threat of climate change. Unfortunately, this isn't the only action he's taken which can be characterized as bad.
|
|
There's More...
:: (4
Comments, 337 words in story)
|
|
Sat Jul 09, 2011 at 10:13:02 AM MST
|
This is via Theoildrum.com and argues that warming can be behind environmental spills. The author has a point: The theory is that climate change is causing unusual flooding. That affects pipelines that were once thought to be buried safely underground, but close to river banks. Investigators into the Yellowstone spill have attributed that reason for the 42,000 gallon leak that is mucking up an area of the beloved national park in Montana.
...
Unusual river flooding causes more severe erosion around river banks, exposing buried objects at a faster than expected rate. Rocks and boulders knocked loose by the flooding can bash against pipelines and knock holes in them, causing massive spills. It's just this kind of incident that investigators suspect caused the Yellowstone oil spill.
However, one would have to be able to show that warming is responsible for the flooding and not a within-norms wet year. I think it's something that should be investigated and questioned when we discuss warming and the effects on our lives.
If it is, there is going to be some pretty heavy investment in shoring up pipelines and other transportation-related industries and those will bring jobs. So, there is something positive about all this, too.
|
|
Discuss
:: (0
Comments)
|
|
Thu Jul 07, 2011 at 15:43:08 PM MST
|
|
After running across some resources again recently, I thought it would be a good idea to put some posts together that showed the background of many of the common facts I discuss. In this first post, I wanted to show the relationship between greenhouse gases, radiative forcing and temperatures. In doing, I will use graphics from the IPCC's 4th Assessment Report Technical Summary.
First, here is a graphic of changes in greenhouse gases from ice core and modern observational data, spanning the time period of 20,000 years ago through current:
The portion of this graph I'd like to focus on is the upper left quadrant displaying the time series of atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration. First, note is the transition from ~180ppm 20,000 years ago to between 260 and 280ppm. This transition helped bring the last interglacial period to an end. Of greater import is the more recent transition from 280ppm to 380ppm (as of ~2005; current concentrations are ~390ppm).
|
|
There's More...
:: (7
Comments, 559 words in story)
|
|
Tue Jun 21, 2011 at 15:53:31 PM MST
|
( - promoted by Fong)
To many who have paid attention to the developing climate change crisis, the news that a mass extinction could occur in the world's oceans shouldn't come as too much of a surprise. Climate change isn't just about higher surface temperatures and slightly different precipitation patterns. No, a set of issues are currently unfolding. That set is getting more complex and more pertinent to our daily lives. A preliminary report, issued by the International Programme on the State of the Ocean (IPSO), begins to detail just how dangerous our actions are to the oceans. Among other things, the report's findings are of critical importance because the panel found that ocean degeneration is already occurring at a much faster rate than has been previously projected.
"The findings are shocking," Dr. Alex Rogers, IPSO's scientific director, said in a statement released by the group. "This is a very serious situation demanding unequivocal action at every level. We are looking at consequences for humankind that will impact in our lifetime, and worse, our children's and generations beyond that."
|
|
There's More...
:: (5
Comments, 350 words in story)
|
|
Fri Jun 10, 2011 at 07:33:18 AM MST
|
|
Readers of my posts should know by now I have been moving away from using certain language when discussing climate change effects. That language includes talking about effects in the far-off future and the uncertainty involved with climate projections (even though they do exist). This transition has happened rapidly as I have read hundred of journal articles detailing the latest science assessments as well as seminal reports like the IPCC's in 2007. Generally speaking, the American public has no idea what is about to hit them. A solid percentage think climate change is occurring and our species is now the dominant forcing mechanism. That's the good news. The bad news is far too few Americans realize how quickly conditions are changing and what those changing conditions mean for their future.
|
|
There's More...
:: (4
Comments, 898 words in story)
|
|
Tue Jun 07, 2011 at 12:48:52 PM MST
|
|
[Note: This post first appeared yesterday in partial form. This is the full post. My apologies.]
The state of global polar sea ice area at the beginning of June 2011 remains poor: well below climatological conditions (1979-2009) continue to persist.
Sea ice in the Arctic continues to track significantly below average, with the 3rd lowest readings for the month in the modern era. Antarctic sea ice recovered somewhat more quickly to normal conditions than was the case the month before. Global sea ice area has therefore remained near historical lows for an extended period of time this year. Within the last month, global sea ice area has finally improved from the 1 million sq. km. deficit from climatological conditions that characterized the first four months of 2011. To help put this in context, only 2006 and 2007 saw similar conditions. In 2007, the Arctic (and global) sea ice area fell to its lowest extent in modern history.
|
|
There's More...
:: (0
Comments, 743 words in story)
|
|
Tue May 24, 2011 at 06:40:44 AM MST
|
Is there a pent up wave of sanity ready to overtop the Republican/Teahadist/Fox dam of reality denial? If you are a glass-half-full person like myself, then you might think so. We have seen the utter collapse of the Birther movement since the president released his long form birth certificate. We are seeing a vast majority of the nation rejecting the idea that we need to lower taxes on the wealthy, especially if it means messing with Medicare and Medicaid.
The reality that gay citizens are really no different from any other citizen and should not be singled out for different treatment is gaining strength both in the courts and the public. Recent decisions in courts have demolished, as a finding of fact, most of the arguments against adoption and marriage for gay citizens. In the world of public opinion the issue of marriage equality is polling above 50% for the first time and shows no sign of going the other way.
Today we see another sign that things may be on the change. USAToday has published and editorial that is comparing climate change deniers to Birthers. This is a big step because the denial of climate change has been going into high gear among Republicans and while it is to be expected in that many of the positions of the modern Republican party are flatly contrary to reality, the numbers of them have an affect on public sentiment that allows these kinds of things a legitimacy they do not deserve
|
|
There's More...
:: (0
Comments, 638 words in story)
|
|
Wed May 11, 2011 at 13:02:58 PM MST
|
|
[Updated some explanations for clarity - WD]
If you encounter national news with any regularity, you've probably heard separate news stories that are very much connected. The first are the record wildfires plaguing Texas - while relatively few in number, the acreage they've burned has set a number of records. The wildfires are accompanied by record drought conditions. The extreme drought conditions cover a large majority (73.73%) of Texas as of May 3, 2011, as the figure below from the U.S. Drought Monitor shows. Exceptional drought conditions now affect a whopping 25.96% of Texas. No part of the state is doing better than abnormally dry this week, which is actually somewhat of an improvement over conditions a week ago.
|
|
There's More...
:: (0
Comments, 593 words in story)
|
|
Sun Mar 27, 2011 at 16:02:10 PM MST
|
Global warming is causing dramatic enough shifts in temperature and precipitation such that downstream effects are starting to show up across the globe. I picked up the following from an economics blog, but wanted to focus on the likely underlying causality to make a point about the future (source):
Dry conditions extending to Oklahoma, Kansas and Colorado may cut crop yields in the U.S., the world's largest exporter, as too much moisture threatens fields in North Dakota and in Canada. Wheat futures in Chicago are up 50 percent in the past year, after drought in Russia and floods in Australia hurt output and sent global food prices surging. Wholesale beef reached a record this week, and the U.S. cattle herd in January was the smallest since 1958.
|
|
There's More...
:: (5
Comments, 186 words in story)
|
|
Sat Mar 12, 2011 at 12:30:42 PM MST
|
|
In September of 2009, just after back to back earthquakes in Samoa and Indonesia, I wrote an article entitled "Climate Change, A whole lot of shaking going on" where scientists have theorized that Earthquakes are increasing due to an unlikely cause - Climate Change.
The theory is that while Earthquakes on different Tectonic plates do not cause others to occur, for instance the Samoan and Indonesian quakes happened within one day of each other, they can be correlated to other quakes and seismic activity - specifically to 'glacial quakes' caused by fast melting and moving multi-ton glaciers on Greenland.
It's been nearly 2 years since then, let's reconsider this theory, and remember, 2 years is not even a blink of an eye in Geologic time.
|
|
There's More...
:: (0
Comments, 1363 words in story)
|
|
Thu Jan 27, 2011 at 15:04:49 PM MST
|
|
In my last 2 State of the Pole posts (Dec and Jan), I noted that the Hudson Bay, the Baffin and Newfoundland Seas and Canadian Archipelago region was witnessing something astonishing: sea ice was forming weeks to months late. I identified a leading cause for this condition: for the 2nd winter in a row, the North Atlantic Oscillation and Arctic Oscillation were registering historical negative values. When they're in their negative phase, both of these climatological phenomena allow arctic air to flow south and impact the U.S. and Europe because the polar jet stream weakens and meanders further south than it normally does. As colder air is allowed to move south, warmer air is allowed to move north. While the eastern U.S. and Europe have experienced a colder than normal winter along with more precipitation than normal, northeastern Canada has experienced the opposite: the warmest 30-day period in mid-winter on record. Of course, the fact that the Arctic has undergone rapid, significant changes in the past decade are also part of the reason for this occurrence. Our influence on the climate system has loaded the die. With each toss, there is a higher chance that extreme weather events will occur.
The climate change denial zombies love to point out snowstorms and cold air outbreaks in the U.S. during winter. They somehow think it means their patron saint James Inhofe was correct when he stated that global warming is the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on mankind. While they're busy pointing out that yes, indeed, it does snow in winter, they try very hard to ignore the fact that seas that should be frozen by December 1st remain unfrozen in late January. Has it been cold along the eastern U.S.? Yes, 5-11°F below average for the 30-day period between 17 December 2010 to 15 January 2011. During that same time, however, northeastern Canada witnessed surface temperatures from 16°F to greater than 38°F above average - for 30 days! Recall that in my write-up of NASA's and NOAA's global temperature analysis for 2010, both agencies identified December as being among the 25 warmest Decembers on record globally. Despite one of the strongest La Ninas on record and a slow emergence from the sun's latest cycle minimum, December was still warm compared to over 100 years of global temperature records at 0.67°F above average. One of the drawbacks of looking at the global average is the possibility of masking averages that might indicate something important occurring over smaller regions - like northeast Canada.
|
|
There's More...
:: (2
Comments, 894 words in story)
|
|
|
|
Squarestate.net is owned by Open Communications Colorado, LLC. and is not responsible for the opinions expressed outside of our own.
|
|