|
caucus
Wed Jan 04, 2012 at 06:17:47 AM MST
|
( - promoted by Fong)
Other headlines of note this morning:
"Santorum Lubed Up for New Hampshire"
"Romney, Santorum and Paul in Three Way"
"The Second Coming of Rick Santorum"
"Santorum Is On Everyone's Lips This Morning"
"Santorum Pulls One Out After Messy Race"
(Weinergate may soon be topped here, folks. If you have no idea why these are funny, google the definition of Santorum.)
But, what does all this mean?
1. Obama for America is giddy from the possibility they may only have to beat a pro-life Tea Party candidate. Then again, Iowa remains a deeply socially conservative rural state, and what happens in Iowa might just stay in Iowa.
2. Ron Paul is so close, he is the real story here. Young white males flock to him like flies on soda cans, and both the GOP and Obama will have to deal with that reality. In my experience as a progressive with an extensive network, Ron Paul also appeals to many young males who formerly voted for Obama, as well. The power of the anti-war platform cannot be underestimated.
The military-industrial complex power brokers will be launching a war against Ron Paul to save their puppet, Romney. Paul won't know what hit him because they will do it in the shadows.
3. Gingrich "has a rusty knife" and based on last night's speech, fully intends to use it against Mitt Romney. This could get very interesting.
I gave up watching my alma mater play an important game last night (Michigan football) because the real game was in Iowa. The "clown car" race keeps getting more and more interesting everyday.
|
|
There's More...
:: (1
Comments, 16 words in story)
|
|
Tue Jul 26, 2011 at 09:52:17 AM MST
|
( - promoted by Fong)
Having moved to CO from CA, where a primary is just a primary, I thought the primary caucus method was confusing and messy. I was all in favor of switching over to a flat primary where many more people get to participate. It seemed unfair that the caucus was at a specific time when many can't get off work to attend.
Recently I've come to realize the caucus serves a really important service by winnowing out the fringe candidates, narrowing the field down to truly viable ones. When CA had the recall election for governor, there were at least 25 names to choose from on the ballot, split between Dems and Reps. Most of the names were not familiar to me or to anyone I talked to.
I, and everyone I know, ended up voting for Schwarzenneger(sp?) because we recognized him and knew that he was pretty moderate for a Republican. For all we knew, any Democrat we chose might have been completely crazy or have ethical problems. Better to choose the devil that we knew.
That doesn't happen here in CO because of the caucuses. By the time the primary election comes around, the field has narrowed down to only two or three best. The extra time between caucus and primary allows all of them to make their case for election.
So, even though not everyone can participate in the caucuses, they help us pick the best candidates. I've decided they are a good thing.
|
|
Discuss
:: (5
Comments)
|
|
|
|
Sat Apr 10, 2010 at 17:54:47 PM MST
|
From the Denver Post
http://blogs.denverpost.com/th...
Challenger Andrew Romanoff won more major caucus victories in Colorado's U.S. Senate race Saturday, taking large margins over incumbent Michael Bennet in urban county assemblies.
Romanoff, former speaker of thhttp://www.squarestate.net/newDiary.doe state House of Representatives, won in Arapahoe, Douglas, Boulder, El Paso and Pueblo counties, among others, in early reports from the largest gatherings. Many of Colorado's most populous counties met Saturday to elect delegates to the state Democratic convention in May.
(so much for the Spin that Romanoff's only stronghold was in Denver)
One point of note - Boulder and El Paso Assemblies had formerly been for Bennet, but today switched to Romanoff.
|
|
There's More...
:: (11
Comments, 159 words in story)
|
|
Wed Mar 17, 2010 at 05:00:00 AM MST
|
|
The Colorado 2010 caucus was above average attendance last night. In 2008 over 92,000 people attended compared to 2006 with just over 8,000. As of press time, there is close to 22,000 or 2.7 times the 2006 levels.
The constellation of GOP numbers [.pdf] makes things interesting. Cleve Tidwell is out (not so interesting, but maybe now we can have some closure). Tea Partyboy Ken Buck and "old guard Jane" Norton are in a dead heat with over a third of the vote each. Former State Senator Tom Wiens doesn't have to petition onto the ballot with 16%.
|
|
There's More...
:: (26
Comments, 233 words in story)
|
|
Tue Mar 16, 2010 at 16:30:25 PM MST
|
|
Caucus starts in about an hour. Find your Dem location and find your Republican location.
There are a few things you can do at your caucus that I think you might want to know about.
First, Colorado Political Institute is doing live coverage and you can contribute by tweeting bits of caucus with #caucusCO in your tweets. Watch the coverage in the above link.
Second, there is a resolution Democrats Rep. Andy Kerr, Senator John Morse, and Speaker of the House Terrance Carroll are encouraging people to propose at their caucuses.
From the video
We therefore call on the Colorado General Assembly to restore the legal rights to Colorado's largest consumer group: homeowners
|
|
There's More...
:: (2
Comments, 47 words in story)
|
|
|
|
Squarestate.net is owned by Open Communications Colorado, LLC. and is not responsible for the opinions expressed outside of our own.
|
|