How Squarestate Works
SquareState

Connect with Squarestate


Gotta Tip???
Go to the archive
Advertise on Squarestate
Online Voter Registration!





Search




Advanced Search


Michael Bennet

Senate Democrat Fail

by: Zappatero

Tue Feb 07, 2012 at 09:53:29 AM MST

Our two regrettable and forgettable senators were key constituents in yet another failure of the Democratic Majority in the U.S. Senate to stop Republicans' assault on the middle class. From FDL:
Senate Passes FAA Authorization Bill with Anti-Union Elements

Despite fierce opposition from major transit unions, the Senate yesterday gave final approval to the FAA Authorization bill, a five-year extension that removes uncertainty from the FAA, approves a next-generation air traffic monitoring system and, in Harry Reid's telling, creates hundreds of thousands of jobs. But unions were unhappy about changes to labor law insisted upon by House Republicans, and they expressed betrayal at the hands of Senate Democrats. (Ho hum. -Ed.)

But 37 Democrats supported the bill, including Commerce Committee chair Jay Rockefeller, Majority Leader Harry Reid, and top leadership members Chuck Schumer and Dick Durbin. Here were the 15 Democrats who opposed it:

Akaka (D-HI), Blumenthal (D-CT), Brown (D-OH), Cardin (D-MD), Casey (D-PA), Franken (D-MN), Gillibrand (D-NY), Harkin (D-IA), Klobuchar (D-MN), Leahy (D-VT), McCaskill (D-MO), Merkley (D-OR), Mikulski (D-MD), Sanders (I-VT), Stabenow (D-MI)
Not worthy of mention to Dayen were Colorado Senators Mark Udall and Michael Bennet, both of whom voted for a bill that makes it more difficult for unions to exist and for middle class workers to maintain quality employment and working conditions. Both senators will give justification for their votes on this bill and say it's just one vote of many.

But the pattern is clear and well-established with our 2 Democratic senators. And it is nothing to write home about. Though Mark Udall writes, and tries, he continues to be a milquetoast who compares quite poorly to his blood-relation senator from New Mexico. Bennet, like his political benefactor Bill Ritter, has shown a complete disregard for labor and unions.

This was yet another failure of Democrats in the Senate. Failure is the only way I can describe Bennet and Udall's unrequited bipartisanship, their double-dealing against the base, and downright tepid attempts at legislating. And if they think constantly playing the "middle" against everyone else is the safest way to win reelection, then there's a quarterback in Denver who can explain how that really works to these veteran politicians who currently represent us.

In case you don't trust this Cheetoh-stained blogger, take a peek at Ed Schultz, former Republican and expert on Upper Midwest values, discussing on the tube:

There's More... :: (4 Comments, 30 words in story)

Senator Michael Bennet renounces Lobbyists/Lobbying

by: Zappatero

Thu Feb 02, 2012 at 20:09:28 PM MST

Senator Michael Bennet has seemingly renounced lobbyists and the fine art of lobbying with his contribution to an ethics-inspired set of amendments submitted to his senate colleagues:
Not to be outdone, freshman Sen. Michael Bennet (D-Colo.) offered an amendment that would impose a lifetime ban on lawmakers ever becoming federal lobbyists.
Since the Senator presumably would apply this rule to all Americans, and knowing he would only submit amendments with the full intent they pass congress and are signed into law, one can only presume he will hold himself to this same strict standard. Bottom line: I expect that Michael Bennet will hold to this principle and never become a lobbyist once his term of office completes.

Or, this could be just another P.R. move by a senator who has learned the broken ways of our capital well enough to denounce them at the same time he uses them to his political advantage. I certainly hope it's the former and not the latter....I fear he would be a much better lobbyist than senator.

Discuss :: (0 Comments)

OMFG! Politico writes Bipartisanship's Obit

by: Zappatero

Mon Jan 30, 2012 at 17:56:51 PM MST

FDL tells me the good news:
On the front of Politico is an article about how the big bipartisan deals that used to be relatively common in Congress now appear to be a thing of the past. From Politico:
 Call it the Split the Difference Scenario - a dream of Washington at its civic-minded best that has flourished for decades, even as the reality of Washington became ever more snarling and contentious.

Sometimes, the dream even came true, in iconic closed-door moments: a bipartisan bargain over Social Security in 1983, a high-drama budget summit at Andrews Air Force Base in 1990, a landmark spending accord between Bill Clinton and Newt Gingrich in 1997.

The striking fact about Washington at the start of 2012 is how many people, in public and private, say they have concluded that the capital is no longer a city of splittable differences.


A-effin'-men to that. Do-Nothing Doug Lamborn didn't need to read this news. Mark Udall and Michael Bennet do. And if they don't believe it, tell them about that Great Bipartisan Rapist Grover Norquist. Instead, Democrats in DC have permission (as if they ever didn't, see Truman, Harry; Roosevelt, Franklin Delano) to act like Democrats and quit negotiating with those who have no intention to negotiate.

UPDATE: If you have the time, Digby explicates beautifully.

Discuss :: (0 Comments)

One less Democratic Wimp in the Senate

by: Zappatero

Tue Dec 27, 2011 at 19:57:03 PM MST

The excruciating, overdue death of bipartisanship is one day nearer. Ben Nelson, Senator from Nebraska, legislative saboteur, and half-assed Democrat, is retiring:
During the few months when his party had 60 votes in the Senate, he was the proverbial 60th vote, and with Republicans unwilling to negotiate on health-care reform he held enormous sway. He held out the longest, and he could have used his vote to demand almost anything. He could have asked for malpractice reform, tougher cost controls, or any other concession that pushed the bill to the right. What he chose to use it for was a parochial demand to give his home state a special Medicaid subsidy.
He's retiring after graciously letting the DSCC blow $600,000 on his now-dead campaign in a series of ads that flouted a contested campaign finance rule:
The maneuver may ultimately haunt Democrats, Mr. Collegio added. "By trying to be clever in helping Nelson," he said, "they may be opening up a can of worms they may not have wanted to open up."
Democrats in DC love bipartisanship, encouraged by media in a pursuit that most Americans say they can do without. It is also true that very few care what the roll call was on a piece of good legislation, while they almost always know who to blame for bad legislation. Ben Nelson was partly the victim of Washington's isolation from the 99% and partly of the false assumption that voters want a bipartisan solution to everything.

Ben Nelson made the right call today. If he really desired to continue serving the people for another six years he could have actually started listening to them again. That shouldn't be so difficult. But many Democrats still have a hard time doing what's right for the people while in the thrall of staffers and media whose priorities are far different than ours.

Michael Bennet, who rightly criticizes the work ethic of his peers in Washington, still can't seem to grasp the basics of Populism 101. His spokesman recently touted the number of votes he made in concurrence with Joe Lieberman. Really? Lieberman? Bennet could learn a thing or two from Nelson's early departure. He might also pass off some of this wisdom to Barack Obama if the opportunity presents itself.

Or he could keep pursuing the path of bipartisanship with the same results he's already achieved - few to none.

Discuss :: (3 Comments)

Who will report this but NPR and Lefty blogs?

by: Zappatero

Sat Dec 10, 2011 at 11:21:49 AM MST

The headline at ThinkProgress:

Republicans And Business Groups Unable To Find One 'Job Creator' Who Opposes A Tax On Millionaires

From the article:

NPR put out a request to Republican offices and the business groups that have been lobbying against the surtax to find business owners who'd be affected. Unsurprisingly, Republican leadership and the business groups came up empty:
We wanted to talk to business owners who would be affected. So, NPR requested help from numerous Republican congressional offices, including House and Senate leadership. They were unable to produce a single millionaire job creator for us to interview.

So we went to the business groups that have been lobbying against the surtax. Again, three days after putting in a request, none of them was able to find someone for us to talk to. A group called the Tax Relief Coalition said the problem was finding someone willing to talk about their personal taxes on national radio.

They are probably unwilling to talk about it because it would expose their greed and selfishness. If the number of Millionaires who said they support increased taxes on the wealthy was increased by two, we would be that much closer to reversing the income inequality trend begun under the Ronald Reagan Presidency.

As the President said last week: Trickle Down does not work.

Discuss :: (0 Comments)

Give me your huddled masses yearning to breath free...

by: Zappatero

Tue Nov 22, 2011 at 11:55:49 AM MST

So they may be pepper-sprayed by Lt. John Pike.

some_text

More Pepper Spray uses against peaceful Americans by our Hyper-militarized Police forces here, here, here, here, here....h/t FDL, tumblr and the Pepper Spraying Cop.

Discuss :: (0 Comments)

Patriotic millionaires step up - CO Millionaires Bennet and Polis stand down

by: Zappatero

Fri Nov 18, 2011 at 09:14:13 AM MST

The transformation of populist Democratic candidates Polis and Bennet to Corporatist Quasi-Republicans is now complete. Though Jared Polis had small chance of acting and being a true Liberal, Michael Bennet was compromised in office from the beginning. Their political trajectories now seem inevitable: each could be one of the worst Democrats Colorado has sent to DC. And this further proves the corrupting power of money in our system and the congenital weakness of modern-day Democrats.

The annual financial report from congress was recently released and Polis (net worth ~$143 Million) and Bennet (Slacker net worth ~$12.2 Million) were both very clearly shown to be in the 1% of Americans, heading for the .1%. This wealth doesn't necessarily preclude Polis and Bennet from pushing for economic justice and progressive policies: the Roosevelts, the Kennedys, and many other Democrats throughout history were perfectly capable. Our millionaires' actions make it clear that they are probably incapable.

Another group of wealthy Americans, though, Patriotic Millionaires for Fiscal Strength came out this week to send a simple message to our representatives - and a specific message to the Congressional Stupor Committee that is getting ready to sell the Middle Class down the river. That simple message?

We are writing to ask you to do the right thing for our country and REJECT ANY Super Committee deal that does not raise tax rates on incomes over $1 million to AT LEAST 39.6%, REGARDLESS of how many deductions are eliminated.

Private jets shouldn't have been tax deductible in the first place.

Thank you,

Patriotic Millionaires and Patriotic Americans


Love it. Poll after poll after poll shows Americans - even Indys and Republicans - agree. The politics of the day say Democrats should pound this message home hourly. But our congressional millionaires, Jared Polis and Michael Bennet have been clearly corrupted by the air in DC and are faint examples of what a Colorado Democrat can be.

Shame on both of them. They are shamed by their Peers in the One Percent: Millionaires who urgently want to preserve the Middle Class, Millionaires who can afford and want to pay more taxes so everyone in America can participate and thrive within a democracy that could be the most wealthy nation in history.

There's More... :: (3 Comments, 502 words in story)

Senator Bennet set to sell out Middle Class

by: Zappatero

Sun Oct 30, 2011 at 09:23:06 AM MST

This would be unbelievable, except for Democrats' recent history as corporate protectors and middle class betrayers:
If there was any doubt in your mind to just how indifferent the 1% is to the needs of the 99%, or whether Bloomberg sees Occupy Wall Street as a mere nuisance, I think this news will clear that right up:
New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg will host an intimate dinner at Gracie Mansion on Sunday night that brings together a bipartisan group of senators, Xerox chief executive Ursula Burns and other business and labor leaders to discuss how to pave the way for the Super Committee to "go big" and cut $4 trillion in federal spending, according to a source familiar with the dinner.

The Washington contingent includes Democratic Sens. Michael Bennet and Mark Warner and Republican Sens. Bob Corker, and Saxby Chambliss, among others. The meeting will be a much smaller, more strategic affair -- 10 to 20 people -- than a similar dinner Warner threw at his home in September, which had a guest list of 60.

The records of the meeting should be released to the public immediately and Bennet should come clean on everything that goes on there. Michael Bennet continues to be disgusting failure as a representative of the people of Colorado.

Maybe a Tea Party senator wouldn't have been so bad after all - at least they laid their cards out up front.

Discuss :: (4 Comments)

Udall, Bennet and Friends prep for Medicare, Social Security cuts

by: Zappatero

Thu Oct 27, 2011 at 06:33:00 AM MST

Democrats on the Stupor Committee are ready to give in to Republican bullying and the insatiable greed that has consumed the most wealthy in our society:
According to exclusive reporting from Reuters the Democrats on the Super Committee are offering to cut Medicare and Medicaid benefits as part of a roughly $3 trillion grand bargain, which would well exceed the $1.2 trillion minimum goal the committee is tasked with meeting. From Reuters:
It calls for between $200 billion and $300 billion in new economic stimulus spending that would be paid for with lower interest payments from reducing deficits.

It also seeks around $400 billion in Medicare savings, with half coming in benefit cuts and the other half in cuts to healthcare providers. Details of that proposal were scant but tackling the popular Medicare program is always politically risky for politicians.

It is unlikely this specific deal being offered by the Democrats on the committee will be accepted by Republicans, because it calls for tax increases and more stimulus, but it still puts our social safety net in danger. It is another instance of the Democratic party steadily moving towards the official position of saying Medicare benefits can and should be cut.
Mark Udall has stated a number of times he's ready to cut Social Security.

Michael Bennet has complained about the way DC does business, yet supports these very efforts by the Cowardly Committee.

Both our senators are still afraid to do that's truly needed to fulfill their oaths and fix our budget mess. They are in mortal electoral fear of Grover Norquist's idiotic pledge and its adherents and the constant rhetorical war Republicans wage on common sense. And they do almost nothing to fight either.

There's More... :: (3 Comments, 135 words in story)

Too little, Too late from Bennet and Udall

by: Zappatero

Thu Aug 04, 2011 at 13:02:17 PM MST

( - promoted by Fong)

Gawd these guys are pathetic:

WASHINGTON - Colorado Democratic Sens. Michael Bennet and Mark Udall? both voted Tuesday to couple a debt-ceiling increase with more than $2 trillion in cuts and deficit reduction over 10 years - a compromise that disappointed them.

Udall said it wasn't the bill he wanted because it didn't include revenues or elimination of tax breaks for billion-dollar corporations, which would have ensured "that the wealthiest among us will help shoulder the burden of balancing our books."

[...] "It will protect our economy from crisis and make a down payment on our debt, two critical first steps."

Bennet called the last four weeks in Washington "disappointing."

Those are two critical first steps, but the most important would be to have the federal government spend more money to actually stimulate the economy.

Both Michael Bennet and Mark Udall have caved on issue after issue since coming to office. Both complain about the results, but both have done nothing that would have changed those results. If they are being team players on the Obama re-election campaign, they better figure out this crap ain't working and that President Obama, sadly, may end up the primary casualty in Mitch McConnell's terror campaign:  

There's More... :: (2 Comments, 377 words in story)

IKEA Workers vote to join Union

by: Zappatero

Wed Jul 27, 2011 at 17:51:03 PM MST

( - promoted by Fong)

IKEA workers have voted to join a union, says Laura at DKos:
Ikea is, not unlike T-Mobile and its German parent company, one of these companies that have good labor practices in Europe and then come to the United States for cheap, union-free labor.

But today, workers at Ikea's Swedwood plant in Danville, Virginia, voted to join a union. The vote was 221-69, despite a typical anti-union campaign:

Rather than remaining neutral and supporting a "Fair and Friendly" election as IKEA management had discussed with BWI and the IAMAW, the United States-based Swedwood management continued to follow the advise of its union avoidance law firm and conducted several activities designed to alter the outcome of the election. Regardless of these intrusive tactics that ranged from "voluntary" meetings with Swedwood management; rumours of plant closure; and promises of bonuses should the union be defeated, the workers decided to join the union. Issues of safety and health, racial discrimination, dignity and basic human respect were the main grievances that the workers had expressed as reasons for voting to join the Machinists Union.
That's a decisive vote. Will IKEA fight it? Will the workers hold fast? Maybe workers have seen that unions aren't all bad and a pro-union, pro-Middle Class craze will sweep into Colorado to IKEA's Littleton store?

Let's frickin' hope so.

And for all the anti-labor, anti-union, pro-corporate whiners who will decry this - you know who you are - let them take the side of this highly profitable foreign corporation over the local Colorado workers who sweat within its walls. I hope they whine about it every day.....

Discuss :: (1 Comments)

More Bipartisan B.S. from Republicans

by: Zappatero

Thu Jun 23, 2011 at 08:41:41 AM MST

( - promoted by Fong)

Like Lucy taking the football from Charlie Brown's poised kicking toe, Republicans have once again punked Democrats on the budget process. Will our side ever learn that they are congenital liars and that Republican leaders cannot be trusted to negotiate in good faith?

House Majority Leader Eric Cantor pulled out of bipartisan negotiations to raise the nation's debt limit, according to multiple reports.

The Wall Street Journal reports that Cantor indicated an impasse over taxes prompted his exit from the budget discussions for now. A GOP aide close to the talks told The Huffington Post that the disagreement could only be settled by President Barack Obama and House Speaker John Boehner.

The aide said that Cantor was open to returning to the table, but that they've come to an impasse over "not so small tax increases" that Democrats are insisting on. "We can't go there, so until Boehner and Obama resolve that, it doesn't make much sense for Eric to keep going to the meetings."

Here again Democrats have demurred on making the case for fairly taxing the rich and corporations to resolve current budget and deficit issues. Cowards like Michael Bennet continue to neglect the fact that taxes are the lowest in generations, and those who aren't paying their fair share are banking trillions of dollars as our economy continues to piddle.

Democrats had better go on the offense, had better figure out how to make tax increases an inevitable occurrence and prepare themselves for the onslaught of lies until the economy turns around.

President Obama could lead the way to sound progressive policies on the budget "crisis". He will certainly have to change some of his assumptions and tactics. Senator Bennet might have the nerve to follow. But now the issue is being kicked down the road again thanks to another strategic win by Republicans and the continuing inability of Democrats to propose common-sense solutions that the public wants and needs. In order to truly kill this ongoing recession - a recession and debt that Republicans are mostly responsible for - Democrats will have to take the heat during the next election cycle and do what's right, maybe even fight for some "not so small" tax increases........something they've been unwilling to do even after given a clear mandate in 2008.

Lucy, will you please hold that football again?

There's More... :: (0 Comments, 4 words in story)

Bennet and Udall prepare to jump off Republican-constructed Medicare/Social Security cliff

by: Zappatero

Thu Jun 09, 2011 at 21:11:15 PM MST

Idiots, the both of them:

Both Colorado Democrat Sens. Mark Udall and Michael Bennet were among the first senators outside the so-called "Gang of Five" to get details - and support - a plan to slash more than $4 trillion from the federal debt through a combination of spending cuts, tax increases and Medicare and Social Security reforms.

Udall and Bennet have been briefed on the details of a still-working plan and officials from their offices said Thursday they are on board to help move the process forward in any way they can.

Sirota was pointing out the other day how DC is a self-contained business model that is completely detached from reality and the rest of America. Colorado's Senators are about to prove his point with another bipartisan compromise* emanating from an institution universally declared dysfunctional even within Washington, DC's prallel universe.

UPDATE: And right on cue The Denver Post jumps in to endorse the bipartisan solution that is halfway between Ayn Randian Social Darwinism and Democrats whose policies are just to the right of Dwight D. Eisenhower.

* - Someone please ban those words from our policy discussions for the next generation.

Discuss :: (0 Comments)

If Senator Bennet wants to cut $530 BILLION from Medicare he should tell us

by: Zappatero

Thu May 19, 2011 at 16:20:54 PM MST

( - promoted by Fong)

Senator Michael Bennet has urged President Obama to heed the Gang of Six's recommendations regarding the nation's next budget:
A bipartisan group of Senators has been working to craft a comprehensive deficit reduction package based upon the recommendations of the Fiscal Commission.  While we may not agree with every aspect of the Commission's recommendations, we believe that its work represents an important foundation to achieve meaningful progress on our debt.

That bipartisan group, the "Gang of Six", was in discussions to cut up to $530 BILLION from future Medicare expenditures.

When Gang of Six talks broke down due to Senator Tom Coburn's congenital defects (hypocrisy and lying) Senator Bennet protested that the Gang was still viable and that the talks should continue:

"I don't think it's dead. And I think, in fact, I would say that has some of the most promise we have because we've got three Democrats, three Republicans, working together to try to come up with a plan."
One can only assume that Michael Bennet supported the plan of all six senators to cut up to $530 BILLION from Medicare. He supported the Gang of Six even after Coburn had quit...with one of the most pitiful quotes I've heard from a United States Senator.

And with all that one can only ask why Bennet wanted the job in the first place.  

Because if he is too cowardly to tell the people of our state that he, too, thinks we need to cut that money from our elderly and sick then he is not properly representing us. And he has no business taking the $174,000 salary we pay him to analyze our nation's problems and make the tough policy decisions that the job, and our citizens, rightly demand.

Discuss :: (3 Comments)

Senator Bennet perpetuates "broken" system and desperately avoids accountability

by: Zappatero

Tue May 17, 2011 at 19:53:20 PM MST

( - promoted by Fong)

Bennet's Bipartisan Budget Buddies II: Mitch McConnell and Tom Coburn

Michael Bennet wanted to be a United States Senator. And he wanted the full imprimatur of voters to a full six-year term to an institution that he repeatedly stated was "broken". He even employed his three daughters to gain sympathy and help drive home his campaign's message:

I agree with the Senator that Washington, DC is a cesspool of too-close relationships and shop-worn rules rituals. Yet why does Bennet time and again endorse those failed habits? Why does he enable the phony bipartisanship loved only by The Denver Post's Editorial page and DC's most elite, and usually conservative, pundits?

Republican Senate Leader Mitch McConnell recently gave us a peak behind the Senate's special form of bipartisanship - a form that allows Senators to escape accountability:

When you do something together, the result is that it's not usable in the election. I think there's an understanding that if there's a grand bargain, none of it will be usable in next year's election.

And this, I'm afraid, is the most likely explanation for Bennet's insatiable quest for bipartisanship in Congress' guerrilla war over how to fund and pay for government. Even as each attempt at bipartisanship fails, Bennet plaintively wails that it really will work, Toto:

Talks among a bipartisan group of senators to try to solve the nation's fiscal woes seem to have stalled in recent weeks, with a separate set of talks led by Vice President Joe Biden taking a larger share of the spotlight.

But senators continue to root them on. On ABC's "Top Line" today, we featured an interview with Sen. Michael Bennet, D-Colo. - who is not among the so-called "Gang of Six" - where he praised their talks and said they are continuing to make progress.

"It's not dead," Bennet told ABC's Jonathan Karl, in the latest installment of the "Subway Series."


Hey Michael: it is dead. Completely Dead:
There's More... :: (4 Comments, 249 words in story)

Bennet's Bipartisan Budget Buddies: Orrin Hatch of Utah

by: Zappatero

Fri May 06, 2011 at 07:47:17 AM MST

( - promoted by Fong)

Senator Michael Bennet is desperate for a bipartisan budget agreement to hide behind. An irrational exuberance for bipartisanship must have been one of the conditions for his job. More likely, I still think he's afraid to actually make a policy decision that will get him a yucky Denver Post Editorial. So much for that (D) behind his name, because that forever makes him a target of the Dan Haley/Dean Singleton Hydra. I don't get our leaders' reticence to act like Democrats here in Colorado: (D) must stand for Defensive in this state.

So, who shall this inexperienced Senator be bi with on the budget?

Let's try Orrin Hatch of Utah, one of the Senate's most accomplished liars. Hatch goes after the Middle Class directly with this latest attempt to free the rich from any of their worldly obligations to the nation that made them so:

There's More... :: (0 Comments, 212 words in story)

Gang of Six Budget talks fail - will Bennet finally start to lead?

by: Zappatero

Wed May 04, 2011 at 10:27:07 AM MST

( - promoted by Fong)

Senator Michael Bennet's hope that he wouldn't have to make any tough decisions regarding our nation's budget and deficit (and tax rate) problems/policies has been dashed:
The Gang of Six simply didn't finish the job, and indeed, it was built to not finish the job, with Republicans desirous to drag out talks so Senate Democrats looked like they didn't have a plan. In this sense it was no different than the Max Baucus-led Gang of Six on the health care law.
Bennet has constantly complained that DC is broken, yet time and again he has deferred to the status quo and ensured that those who broke the system are able to keep it broken. The Baucus Health care "product" was horribly weak and Republicans kept nitpicking at it even after the bipartisan gang had an "agreement". The current debate to bring the budget into balance has all the same dynamic, and a Republican Party that continues to deceive even as they pretend to negotiate in good faith with their peers.

Bennet seemingly couldn't resist another shot at bipartisanship despite its repeated failures. It's just as likely he doesn't have the fortitude to take a real stand in the debate. Or maybe he just doesn't want to do anything that could piss anyone off.

Fat chance of that in this day and age.

Bennet shouldn't think his opponents will change a 100% successful strategy of PNK'ing D's and perverting democracy in the budget and deficit discussions. Why would they? Yes, Senator Bennet is green, but he's been in the Senate long enough to see the dominant pattern. He shouldn't trust Republicans on the budget and shouldn't be allowed to pass off his decisions to another round of dysfunctional bipartisanship. Time for Bennet to lead for once and show voters at least some of what they voted for.

Discuss :: (2 Comments)

BULLETIN: Democrat acts like Democrat, successfully engages electorate on Democratic Policies

by: Zappatero

Fri Apr 29, 2011 at 06:59:48 AM MST

( - promoted by Fong)

So an informed electorate will respond positively to Democratic policies when presented to them without the milquetoast triangulation that we normally see from (D)'s.

Who is that Democrat? The brilliant Governor Jerry  Brown of California:

First, he didn't come out of the starting block with a compromise pleasing to the entrenched extremist Republican minority obstructing a tax increase (unlike a certain President we know) (ref. John Hickenlooper).  He made a definite proposal and he stuck to it.  When the Tea Party gurus tried to change the subject and make unions the issue, not taxes, Brown refused to fall for the Shock Capitalist feignt and stuck by the unions.  He didn't flinch or apologize for his support of higher taxes, even suggesting - mirabile dictu - that the GOP's zombielike anti-tax dogma showed their bad faith and lack of concern for Californians (ref. Bennet and Udall).  They squealed like stuck pigs with lipstick on (don't apologize Obama) and looked foolish.
What else could the supremely intelligent Brown teach our timid Senators?
Second, Brown talked directly to the people of California, not just the obstreperous and incoherent Republican commandants.   Again, unlike a certain President.  Over and over again, he took his message to YouTube (you got to love that), as well as highschool gyms and union halls.  For a septuagenarian he made a certain young president look like a geezer.  Again the GOP squealed, and most people here saw the Republicans for what they are: ideological bullies who act like South Park's Cartman when somebody stands up to them.
There are more lessons for local (D)'s that can be learned from Jerry Brown. Sure, Mike Rosen would make fun of them and him, but is there an issue that he wouldn't -- no matter the source?

No, and that's the primary lesson our Senators, our Governor, and our unemployed Representatives can learn from a successful Democratic Leader.

Discuss :: (0 Comments)

This bears repeating

by: Zappatero

Tue Apr 26, 2011 at 21:12:15 PM MST

Eli at FDL:

Even after back-to-back landslides delivered them the White House and huge majorities in both houses of Congress, they refused to take a stand for sound policy or Democratic principles.

Instead, they sought common ground with the Republicans no matter how wrong and cruel they might be, inching ever rightward until they achieved a suitably pro-corporate outcome.

It can't be said much more clearly than that.

Michael Bennet has been a key to Barack Obama's capitulation on a large number of key Democratic and democratic principles. It really needs to come to an end before we lose The New Deal, The Great Society, and what's left of The Middle Class. Michael Bennet, as the old Tennessee saying goes, is either with us or agin' us.

Right now I fear it's the latter. It should be the former.

Discuss :: (0 Comments)

Michael Bennet, the crown prince of "bipartisan" shock doctrine

by: Mucius Scaevola

Fri Mar 18, 2011 at 12:06:55 PM MST

( - promoted by Fong)


Press release here

March 18, 2011
Bennet, Johanns Lead Bipartisan Call for President to Support Comprehensive Deficit Reduction
32 Republicans, 32 Democrats Sign Letter

WASHINGTON, DC - U.S. Sens. Michael Bennet(D-Colo.) and Mike Johanns (R-Neb.) today led a bipartisan call for President Obama to support a comprehensive deficit reduction package in any negotiations on the budget.

In a letter to the President, 64 Senators ask him to engage in budget negotiations beyond FY2011 that include discretionary spending cuts, entitlement changes and tax reform, to create meaningful deficit reduction. The letter notes that a bipartisan group of Senators has been working to craft a comprehensive deficit reduction package based upon the recommendations of the Fiscal Commission, and that the group's work represents an important foundation to achieve meaningful progress on our debt.

"By approaching these negotiations comprehensively, with a strong signal of support from you, we believe that we can achieve consensus on these important fiscal issues.  This would send a powerful message to Americans that Washington can work together to tackle this critical issue," the senators wrote.

They are pretending to want to "balance the budget" when what they are really doing is ramping up their war against the poor and middle class.  Where is there any mention here of the multi-trillion-dollar pricetags for our wars in the Middle East and other military expenditures? Where is there any mention of the deregulatory factors that caused the global financial meltdown, which led to the colossal bailout of Wall Street?  These are the same senators who recently doubled down on the budget deficit by extending tax breaks for millionaires and billionaires, but now they want us to believe that the reason why they're attacking essential public services is because they're "deficit hawks"?  

This isn't about the budget, people. The budget is a pretext for expanding the oligarchy's class warfare against the poor and the middle class in America and around the world.
 

There's More... :: (11 Comments, 428 words in story)
Next >>
Squarestate.net is owned by Open Communications Colorado, LLC. and is not responsible for the opinions expressed outside of our own.
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Resources
Online Voter Registration!
Blog Roll
Abandon Your Car
American Indian Movement Colorado
Argusfest
The Bell
Big Media
Colorado Capitol Watch
Colorado Confluence Colorado Ethics Watch
Colorado Independent
Colorado Progressive Jewish News
Coloradopols
Congresspedia
Coyote Gulch
CritterThink
DemNotes
Denver Direct
Denver Voice
El Centro Humanitario
El Seminario
Great Education Colorado
La Voz
Lefty Blogs
Liberal Latina
Mario Solis-Marich
Mariowire
Outta the Cornfield
Pocho Blog
Politics West
Rocky Mountain Activist
Scholars and Rogues
Steam Powered Opinions
TriLakeDems
Ultimate Politics
Union Staff for Union
Democracy

Wash Park Prophet
WeatherDem - the blog
Wide Streets

Get Involved
Deep Green Resistance
Occupy Denver
Occupy Everywhere

What We Listen To
KUNC 91.5 FM
AM 760: Boulder's Progressive Talk
KCFR 1340 AM
KGNU 1390AM or 88.5FM
KRFC 88.9FM
Citizen Radio
MicCheckRadio
Democracy Now!
Progressive Voice
Colorado State Legislature

Reference
CoMaps.org
General Assembly
Prospector
Secretary of State
Tax Tracks
TRACER
WikiLeaks.org

Powered By
SoapBlox



Active Users
Currently 2 user(s) logged on.

SquareState.net is owned by Open Communications Colorado, LLC
Powered by: SoapBlox