|
Mark Udall
Thu Mar 03, 2011 at 09:35:03 AM MST
|
It's not Mark, it's Senator Tom Udall, the one who's not afraid to make his case and propose significant policy options to reduce our dependence on foreign oil:
Events that continue to unfold in the Middle East and Northern Africa have once again exposed our country's Achilles heel -- an addiction to foreign oil.
We really are addicted to any and all oil - not just foreign. Even Bush 43 knew that. While Neocons wants us to engage in another Arab country (two wars aren't enough?) to ensure that ever-flowing I.V. solution, Senator Udall lays out some other simple solutions - once again, because we really don't seem to get the point - that can reduce our need for that nasty Black Tar and its equally harmful derivatives:
|
|
There's More...
:: (0
Comments, 234 words in story)
|
|
|
|
Wed Dec 29, 2010 at 09:42:00 AM MST
|
( - promoted by Fong)
We've all seen the dysfunction in the Senate caused by hyper-political Republicans who care about only one thing: having the presidency of Barack Obama fail no matter the cost to our citizens.
Democrats are now almost unanimous in their support of a rule change for the next congress that will kill the filibuster: All of the returning members of the Democratic caucus in the U.S. Senate but Chris Dodd signed a letter that supports filibuster reform initiated by New Mexico's Tom Udall, according to story in the National Journal by Dan Friedman.
The letter was sent to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid urging him to change filibuster rules.
Udall cites Article 1, Section 5 of the U.S. Constitution, specifically the portion which says -- Each House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings. On the first day of the new Congress the Senate can pass new rules with a simple majority. Both our Senators have said they support the rule change.
Bennet: "I applaud Senator Udall for his thoughtful proposal to reform the filibuster. Bringing a new voice to the issue helps us continue to build momentum for improving the Senate's rules so we can actually get back to doing Colorado's business." Udall:"The Senate has suffered way too much gridlock, and there is a strong sense by the public that the Senate is dysfunctional." Now they need to get it done.
|
|
Discuss
:: (3
Comments)
|
|
Wed Dec 08, 2010 at 13:05:07 PM MST
|
( - promoted by Fong)
Would Dems quote a Founder on tax policy in order to finally rebut the destructive and anti-democratic steamroller that is Republican economic policy?Another means of silently lessening the inequality of property is to exempt all from taxation below a certain point, and to tax the higher portions or property in geometrical progression as they rise.
A progressive tax on the wealthiest Americans. A Jefferson fetishist (I'd say fraud) like Jon Caldara might even agree. But what about our side?
Can Michael Bennet vote for enough bills favorable to Citi, Wells Fargo, and Goldman to make Republicans support him?
Will Mark Udall's tepid forays into bipartisanship stop them from calling him a "Boulder Liberal" next time out?
Should Betsy Markey have triangulated further against those who voted her in office?
Should John Salazar have completely forgotten he was ever a (D) in that hideous video?
The answer should be obvious today as it was on that stroll Jefferson took in pre-revolutionary France. Would Democrats be so bold as to follow in a Founder's footsteps?
|
|
Discuss
:: (1
Comments)
|
|
Fri Aug 13, 2010 at 19:11:16 PM MST
|
( - promoted by Fong)
Don't let anyone tell you Mark Udall is going to play it safe for six years, make easy calls on bland issues, and undo the taint of the half-assed "Boulder Liberal" smear compliment Dick Wadhams tried to use against him ad nauseam in '08.
Nosireebob, this guy has Proud Progressive tattooed to the inside of his eyelids: "Thank you Al Franken, John Kerry, Mark Udall, and all other Senators who favor Elizabeth Warren to head the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau! Thank you for putting Americans first!" Next from Mark: taking up for the Public Option where Michael Bennet petered out and calling out John McCain, if only privately, on his warmongering so we can rebuild our national parks.
Cuz we know they're going to call Mark the same thing no matter what he does, anyway.
Don't we, Mark?
|
|
Discuss
:: (4
Comments)
|
|
Mon Jul 19, 2010 at 10:41:05 AM MST
|
|
Said Roy Teicher, spokesperson for the Andrew Romanoff campaign in reference to Colorado Senators Udall and Bennet's vote-switch on an amendment by VT Sen Bernie Sanders (God bless his soul) that would have capped credit card interest rates at 15%. In other words, this was like a national version of Colorado's successful attempt at ending usurious payday lending practices, reform of which struggled though the Colorado state legislature this last session.
Remember that? All the fighting and all the buzz about protecting the middle class? Now we've lost an opportunity to protect the middle class in the worst recession since the Depression and our Colorado Senators voted in a most despicably suspicious way.
:( All this time I thought Udall was a Boulder liberal :(
To the discerning, perhaps intelligent eye, it looks like Udall and Bennet first voted No on the amendment but when they saw there was a majority of sell-outs in the Senate who were also voting No, pandering to multi-billion dollar bailout recipients who used taxpayer money to "invest" in our "democracy", they changed their votes to Yes so it would go on the record that they were in support of it when in fact, it's possible, they never intended to support it.
And since it's the US Senate AND 2010, it was caught on tape.
|
|
There's More...
:: (20
Comments, 51 words in story)
|
|
|
|
Squarestate.net is owned by Open Communications Colorado, LLC. and is not responsible for the opinions expressed outside of our own.
|
|