How Squarestate Works

Tell Colorado's Democratic Senators Yes to Filibuster Reform and No to the Not Dead Yet Grand Bargain

Contact Senator Mark Udall - (877) 768-3255 And Senator Michael Bennet - (866) 455-9866

SquareState

Connect with Squarestate


Gotta Tip???
Go to the archive
Advertise on Squarestate
Online Voter Registration!







Search




Advanced Search


Ken Buck

Support James Shelton in Colorado HD 49

by: kippcolorado

Sat Sep 29, 2012 at 15:57:23 PM MST

James Shelton, my local Democratic candidate for Colorado House District 49 (primarily rural Larimer Countyplus a slice of western Weld County), is in a very tough race against Perry Buck, wife of the notorious failed Tea Party Senate candidate Ken Buck. James Shelton deserves support from progressives throughout Colorado. The Republicans currently hold a one-seat majority in the Colorado House, need I say more? The Weld County/ALEC Republican Tea Party machine is backing the Bucks and James Shelton can be their undoing. Please contribute at www.sheltonforcolorado.com .
Discuss :: (0 Comments)

"A Choice Between Our Hopes and Our Fears"

by: Steve Harvey

Mon Oct 18, 2010 at 20:28:13 PM MST

( - promoted by Fong)

cross-posted on Colorado Confluence: http://coloradoconfluence.com/...

The title quote, uttered by President Obama to describe the choice we have in the 2010 elections, captures the essence of the on-going struggle between humanity's inner-angels and inner-demons, a struggle which produces the realization of both our dreams and our nightmares, depending on which prevails in any given moment of history.

What follows is a full exposition of the meaning of the title phrase, including its significance in U.S. and World History, to the U.S. Constitution, and to the Colorado gubernatorial and U.S. Senate races of 2010.

There's More... :: (0 Comments, 1790 words in story)

PPP Says Bennet 46, Buck 45

by: saindenver

Tue Oct 05, 2010 at 21:47:32 PM MST

( - promoted by Fong)

Public Policy Polling reports a closing race.
Bennet is winning 85% of Democrats and Buck is winning 84% of Republicans. Bennet's slight edge comes because of something that is pretty unusual for Democratic candidates across the country this year- he's ahead 48-38 with independent voters.

The details show moderate voters, who make up a majority of unaffiliated voters in our state, to be moving in support of Bennet.

Bennet had a slight party unity advantage previously, but the candidates have now
equally locked up their bases. What is keeping Bennet treading water, though, despite the negative trends in the partisan makeup of the electorate, is that he has taken a 48-38 lead among independents, versus a 39-40 deficit two months ago. Undecided independents seem to be moving the Democrat's way. Unlike in most states, independents have actually grown as a share of the voter set, while partisans have declined, and Republicans have only increased by two points-down one to Democrats in August, up one now-a good sign for Bennet in this nail-biter of a race.

Donate some money.  Walk a block, call some voters, talk to your friends and neighbors.  This is far from over, and the Tea Party Republicans may have a bad November 3rd.  

Discuss :: (10 Comments)

The Angle Extremists

by: saindenver

Mon Oct 04, 2010 at 21:17:34 PM MST

( - promoted by Fong)

Sharon Angle had this to say the other day
Angle added, however, that in the U.S. Senate, there's likely to be a small contingent of extremists. "When I go [to D.C.], there may be five or six of us.... Maybe Joe Miller (Alaska), Ken Buck (Colorado), Christine O'Donnell (Delaware)." She said Florida's Marco Rubio might even be part of the group.

Isn't this a small enough reason to deny Ken Buck election?  Michael Bennet won't be a part of the destroyers in the Senate, but Ken Buck will.  

Discuss :: (0 Comments)

No Exceptions Caucus - Will They Imprison Women For Having An Abortion?

by: Bill Egnor AKA Something The Dog Said

Tue Sep 21, 2010 at 06:15:19 AM MST

There are five Republican Senate nominees who would outlaw abortion in all cases, no exceptions for rape or incest. You probably know them but I'll list them anyway, Ken Buck (here  the great State of Colorado), Sharron Angle, Christine O'Donnell, Joe Miller and Rand Paul (real freaking Libertarian of you there Rand, how do you sleep at night with that level of hypocrisy weighing you down?) . This is what the Tea Party has brought us, people who believe that no matter what the Supreme Court has said time and again there abortion should be illegal and should have no exceptions for health or criminality.

It all seems to be part of their toughness shtick. Where everything is a life and death fight and they will take any position to the maximal and then declare that it is main stream. I love  this tactic when it is my seven year old nephew and he insists he is a super-hero just because he says so, but it is more than a little frightening in someone who could be a United States Senator and be one for the next six years, at least.  

There's More... :: (7 Comments, 689 words in story)

Ken Buck Crashes Romanoff's Party But Won't Take Questions???

by: Fong

Fri Aug 27, 2010 at 00:57:20 AM MST

This evening Andrew Romanoff held a birthday party in part to help retire his campaign debt and for some reason, Ken Buck, in a classless, antagonistic move crashed the party. Attendees who wanted to take the opportunity to question Buck's policies (and sanity) say Buck wouldn't answer any questions.

Who the f#(k does this prick think he is to walk into a hornets nest and then thumb his nose at honest questions?  

What a coward. I wonder if Buck will ever prove Norton's questioning his manhood wrong. So far it seems that's the only thing she's been right about.  

Discuss :: (5 Comments)

Toss Phyllis Schlafly On The Pile of Racist, Jackass Endorsers For Whom Ken Buck Must Apologize

by: Fong

Fri Jul 30, 2010 at 12:03:34 PM MST

First Buck has to back peddle for Tom Tancredo's comments about Obama.

Then Buck calls the Tea Party "jackasses". So much for their support.

Now Ken is endorsed by this crazy woman and her PAC:


Do you know what was the second biggest demographic group that voted for Obama, obviously the blacks were the biggest demographic group, but do y'all know what was the second biggest? Unmarried women. 70% of unmarried women voted for Obama and this is because if you kick your husband out, you gotta have Big Brother goverment to be your provider, and they know that! And they've admitted it.





Phyllis Schlafly was the "most visible opponent to the ERA.

So does Ken Buck agree with the racist, sexist goals of this woman and her PAC or is this another group to whom he caters but then slanders behind their backs?

He looks pretty sexist to me.

h/t TPM

Discuss :: (2 Comments)

There's no denying that what Ken Buck said is really, really sexist

by: Fong

Wed Jul 21, 2010 at 23:55:43 PM MST

and the way the crowd guffaws at it is revelatory of the nature of the teabaggers as well.

Prepare for the jaw drop:

Question: Why should we vote for you?

Ken Buck: Because I don't wear high heels. She questioned my manhood, I think it's fair to respond.

Here's the video where she questions his manhood:

There's More... :: (1 Comments, 208 words in story)

Ken Buck has no solutions and neither does the GOP

by: Fong

Mon Jul 19, 2010 at 23:01:00 PM MST

Here's a simple question for all of you loud-mouthed Republicans who constantly complain about government spending: What would you cut from the budget?

Ken Buck can't seem to get it together and answer this question. How udderly shocking.

From the Durango Herald

DH: What should be cut in the federal budget?

Buck: The National Endowment for the Arts. The National Endowment for Humanities. Subsidies for many programs - we've got to look at privatizing some programs. We've got to look at departments like the Department of Education and ask really what they should be doing and what we need to return to local control. The Department of Energy's mission was to make America less reliant on foreign energy. That mission was set in 1977. We're more reliant on foreign energy than we were before. So we've got to evaluate whether agencies and departments are really doing the job that we've set out for them.

So, anything that enriches society beyond a metric and has a greater potential to encourage people to question what's going on with their failing power structures, must be privatized?

But let's never forget that one of the most glaring examples of when a Dept of the govt was privatized, it was horribly expensive and outrageously expensive-- but the lobbyists and their respective industries made out like bandits.

BAD IDEA, KEN.

Plus, the Colorado Independent points out that the programs Ken cites are less than 2% of the discretionary budget. That's not significant.

Moving on,

There's More... :: (2 Comments, 178 words in story)

If you HAVE to endorse a Republican, I GUESS it should be her

by: Fong

Sun Jul 18, 2010 at 23:02:29 PM MST

But she still makes me wanna chuck in my mouth.

Jane Norton gets a (reluctant, in my mind) endorsement from the Denver Post. (which has done a lot to piss me off lately).

A Conservative nitwit could whine her paporial nod is "a part of the liberal media shiny shiny meow meow meow" but we know they're stupid.

...even if they're occasionally a majority...

Either way, Buck is flip-floppy crazy, and Jane Norton is just an attention whore.

Yeah, I said it.  

Discuss :: (0 Comments)

Another poll shows Romanoff is stronger general election candidate

by: StrykerK2

Tue Jul 13, 2010 at 14:46:38 PM MST

( - promoted by Fong)

Today a new poll came out that showed that Romanoff is the stronger Democratic candidate against either Norton or Buck.  Against either candidate, Bennet loses handily.

The latest Rasmussen Reports telephone survey of Likely Voters in Colorado finds Buck earning 48% support against incumbent Democratic Senator Michael Bennett who gets 39% of the vote.

If former House Speaker Andrew Romanoff is his Democratic opponent, Buck leads by a narrower 47% to 42% margin.

A month ago, Buck posted a 46% to 41% lead over Bennet and a 45% to 39% lead over Romanoff.

There's More... :: (28 Comments, 63 words in story)

Cinamon, do we have a poll too?

by: StrykerK2

Wed Jun 23, 2010 at 12:05:53 PM MST

(Desperate times call for desperate measure...ments... - promoted by Fong)

A few days ago everyone was talking about a new poll that showed Buck and Bennet winning their respective primaries (along with polling showing that both Maes and McInnis had a slight lead over Hickenlooper)

Apparently the Norton campaign wasn't too thrilled with the attention it was getting, so they decided to release a poll of their own.

details after the jump

There's More... :: (0 Comments, 552 words in story)

Josh Penry to Manage Jane Norton's Senate Campaign

by: Fong

Wed Apr 21, 2010 at 12:02:41 PM MST

Senate Minority Leader Josh Penry (R-Grand Junction) will be busy this summer managing Jane Norton's campaign as she shifts further to the right. Ken Buck, the Tea Party candidate, bestowed one sizeable whomp upon Jane in the county assemblies pushing her to, according to Republican Party rules, illegally petition onto the ballot. Penry, who is one of the most reliable assholes in the Senate, should compliment this strategy well as she journeys into the hate-filled thought-desert of Tea baggery where Obama is a Muslim and the Department of Education is null and void.

Discuss :: (1 Comments)

Caucus Results And Questions

by: Fong

Wed Mar 17, 2010 at 05:00:00 AM MST

The Colorado 2010 caucus was above average attendance last night. In 2008 over 92,000 people attended compared to 2006 with just over 8,000. As of press time, there is close to 22,000 or 2.7 times the 2006 levels.

The constellation of GOP numbers [.pdf] makes things interesting. Cleve Tidwell is out (not so interesting, but maybe now we can have some closure). Tea Partyboy Ken Buck and "old guard Jane" Norton are in a dead heat with over a third of the vote each. Former State Senator Tom Wiens doesn't have to petition onto the ballot with 16%.  

There's More... :: (26 Comments, 233 words in story)
Squarestate.net is owned by Open Communications Colorado, LLC. and is not responsible for the opinions expressed outside of our own.
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Resources
Online Voter Registration!
Blog Roll
Abandon Your Car
American Indian Movement Colorado
Argusfest
The Bell
Big Media
Colorado Capitol Watch
Colorado Confluence Colorado Ethics Watch
Colorado Independent
Colorado Progressive Jewish News
Coloradopols
Congresspedia
Coyote Gulch
CritterThink
DemNotes
Denver Direct
Denver Voice
El Centro Humanitario
El Seminario
Great Education Colorado
La Voz
Lefty Blogs
Liberal Latina
Mario Solis-Marich
Mariowire
Outta the Cornfield
Pocho Blog
Politics West
Rocky Mountain Activist
Scholars and Rogues
Steam Powered Opinions
TriLakeDems
Ultimate Politics
Union Staff for Union
Democracy

Wash Park Prophet
WeatherDem - the blog
Wide Streets

Get Involved
Deep Green Resistance
Occupy Denver
Occupy Everywhere

What We Listen To
KUNC 91.5 FM
AM 760: Boulder's Progressive Talk
KCFR 1340 AM
KGNU 1390AM or 88.5FM
KRFC 88.9FM
Citizen Radio
MicCheckRadio
Democracy Now!
Progressive Voice
Colorado State Legislature

Reference
CoMaps.org
General Assembly
Prospector
Secretary of State
Tax Tracks
TRACER
WikiLeaks.org

Powered By
SoapBlox



Active Users
Currently 0 user(s) logged on.

SquareState.net is owned by Open Communications Colorado, LLC
Powered by: SoapBlox