|
Immigration
|
|
Thu Aug 19, 2010 at 06:15:39 AM MST
|
|
In a frenzy of xenophobia the Radical Republican has been talking up the idea of changing the 14th Amendment or so-called birthright citizenship. The argument is that there are thousands and thousands of late term unauthorized immigrants coming here to have their children. The children born here are citizens and this is either a) a plan for the parents to get to stay in the United States or b) future terrorist agents (this last one is so risible that only in the age of Faux News and Talk Radio could it get any play at all).
As with the 51Park Islamic Community Center they see this as a good wedge issue to whip up their fear addicted base and get them out the polls. This might seem like a new tactic, but like all Radical Republican ideas it is just a case of everything old is new again. The Congress has had hearings on the issue, way back in the mists of time, in 1995 and 1997, just after Radical Republicans had taken control of the Congress. Scott Wong over at Politico brought this to light.
|
|
There's More...
:: (1
Comments, 1187 words in story)
|
|
Fri May 28, 2010 at 09:29:17 AM MST
|
(As Mario Solis Marich said "this guy is the gift that keeps on giving" which I would agree with if racism and bar-lowering were gifts. - promoted by Fong)
Recently I have detailed the relationship that Republican Senate candidate Rand Paul of Kentucky and State Senator Russel Pearce of Arizona have with their Neo Nazi, white supremacist supporters.
That is why it was no surprise to me to learn today that Rand Paul told a Russian journalist that he opposes birth citizenship as protected under the 14th Amendment, or, as Russel Pearce calls it "anchor babies".
We're the only country I know of that allows people to come in illegally have a baby and then that baby becomes a citizen. And I think that should stop also.
thinkprogress.org
Yeah, that's called the Section 1 of the 14th Amendment
More below the fold.
|
|
There's More...
:: (5
Comments, 579 words in story)
|
|
Wed May 26, 2010 at 22:16:37 PM MST
|
(Statement from one Latina Denver's School Board Member. - promoted by Fong)
As a child, I sat by my father's knee, as the stories of workers' struggles for workplace fairness and civil rights marches washed over me. It is so important for our young people to understand their rights and fight for justice, and so it was with great pride (and a little matronly concern) that I watched the news about the recent Denver Public Schools student marches and walkouts in the aftermath of the passage of Arizona's SB 1070.
One reason I ran for the Denver Board of Education was to ensure that our Latino youth can not only recite the U.S. Constitution, but also understand it on a deep, intrinsic level. I want for them to embrace it as I do, to wield it as the sword of justice to defend the rights of all, not just Latinos.
Our responsibility as adults, therefore, is to ensure that our youth are armed with truth. So it was with great dismay that I read in a recent issue of Denver's bilingual newspaper, El Semanario, that, "Youth called out legislators who have worked to enact laws...which are discriminatory by nature, including Andrew Romanoff who had voted against in-state tuition for children of undocumented immigrants."
|
|
There's More...
:: (5
Comments, 438 words in story)
|
|
Wed May 05, 2010 at 13:10:56 PM MST
|
(uhmm... you know what to do... FIGHT! - promoted by Fong)
2006's Immigration-apalooza was probably too long ago for most voters to remember. The legislature passed 10 immigration bills and two referendums -- which voters then approved. For a little walk down 2006 memory lane, click here
In 2006, I thought the Dems and Romanoff did the right (bad) thing. They passed bad legislation, so the extremists wouldn't pass worse legislation. Polly Baca is clinging to that past and future for Romanoff:
Colorado then would have been Arizona now, without Democrats blocking the worst, Baca said.
But really...
|
|
There's More...
:: (71
Comments, 263 words in story)
|
|
Tue May 04, 2010 at 23:21:51 PM MST
|
( - promoted by Fong)
By Kristen Painter
From New Era News
Edgar Niebla, 27, attended public school in Basalt, Colorado from 3rd grade through his high school graduation in 2000. As a teenager, he was active in his church youth group and other school groups. His dream has always been to work in law enforcement. Niebla graduated from the police academy and is certified to be a police officer in Colorado.
At 6:30 a.m. on Wednesday, Apr. 28, Niebla was awoken by his crying mother and told, "The police are here for you."
The ICE (U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement) officers were not there as co-workers, or to offer him his dream job. Instead, they were there to enforce the law upon him.
His crime: growing up in the United States, but having been born in Culiacán, Mexico.
|
|
Discuss
:: (0
Comments)
|
|
Mon May 03, 2010 at 06:47:41 AM MST
|
|
Defenders of the Arizona "Papers Please" law are quick to say that it is not racist. They don't want it to be seen clearly that this is aimed at Latino immigrants and people from Mexico specifically. The problem is that they are defending the indefensible. The supposedly non-partisan and non-racist folks at FAIR (Federation for American Immigration Reform) who wrote the law points to the fact it does not single out any immigrant group.
The thing is that it does. There an estimated 12 million informal immigrants in the United States today. When many people hear that they think of a brown hoard of folks who speak Spanish and come from places like Mexico or Guatemala or Honduras. Just like most race based images they are wrong. At last estimate more than 10% of those 12 million are not brown skinned, they are not from places to our south, and they are actually from Europe.
|
|
There's More...
:: (0
Comments, 766 words in story)
|
|
|
|
Tue Apr 27, 2010 at 13:26:27 PM MST
|
(Arizona, WTF? - promoted by Fong)
U.S. Senate Candidate Andrew Romanoff today issued the following statement:
"The passage of Senate Bill 1070 marks a terrifying turn of events, not only for Arizona but for the United States as a whole. Anyone who lives in or visits Arizona may now be stopped if a law-enforcement official has "reasonable suspicion" to believe that he or she is unlawfully present.
As the son and grandson of immigrants - and as an American - I am outraged by this decision. Arizona's new law invites racial profiling and puts police officers themselves in an impossible position, by requiring them, in effect, to violate the rights of people they are sworn to protect.
This law is unwise, unsafe and unconstitutional. Indeed, it is un-American.
Arizona's action cannot stand:
(1) Today I ask the U.S. Department of Justice to file for injunctive relief in federal court to prohibit the enforcement of the Arizona statute.
(2) I urge the Attorney General to dispatch a legal team to Arizona to defend the Constitutional rights of those affected by this reckless law.
(3) I call on Congress to replace Arizona's misguided effort with federal action - now long overdue.
|
|
There's More...
:: (15
Comments, 211 words in story)
|
|
Thu Apr 22, 2010 at 00:10:08 AM MST
|
|
Arizona's SB 1070 is some of the worst, most racist and counter-productive legislation in recent memory and people are speaking out against it and getting arrested for it. I want to show you some footage of that arrest, what an Arizona business and immigration attorney has to say about how this subsidizes racist lawsuits, and the list of only a few of the egregious points from the bill.
I would also like to note the acronym GIITEM for Gang and Immigration Intelligence Team Enforcement Mission.
From the fact sheet:
1. Requires a reasonable attempt to be made to determine the immigration status of a person during any legitimate contact made by an official or agency of the state or a county, city, town or political subdivision (political subdivision) if reasonable suspicion exists that the person is an alien who is unlawfully present in the U.S...
5.Allows a law enforcement officer, without a warrant, to arrest a person if the officer has probable cause to believe that the person has committed any public offense that makes the person removable from the U.S...
7.Disallows officials or agencies of the state or political subdivisions from adopting or implementing policies that limit immigration enforcement to less than the full extent permitted by federal law, and allows a person to bring an action in superior court to challenge an official or agency that does so...
8. Requires the court, if there is a judicial finding that an entity has committed a violation, to order any of the following:
a)that the plaintiff recover court costs and attorney fees;
b)that the defendant pay a civil penalty of not less than $1,000 and not more than $5,000 for each day that the policy has remained in effect after the filing of the action.
9. Requires the court to collect and remit the civil penalty to the Department of Public Safety (DPS), which must establish a special subaccount for the monies in the account established for the Gang and Immigration Intelligence Team Enforcement Mission GIITEM appropriation.
14.Directs the person to pay jail costs and an additional assessment of at least $500 for the first violation or at least $1,000 for subsequent offenses...
18.Specifies that it is unlawful, if a motor vehicle is stopped on a street, roadway or highway and blocks or impedes the normal movement of traffic:
a)for a motor vehicle occupant to attempt to hire or hire and pick up passengers for work at a different location;
b)for a person to enter the motor vehicle in order to be hired by a motor vehicle occupant and to be transported to work at a different location...
29. States that it is not entrapment for law enforcement officers or their agents merely to use a ruse or to conceal their identities
30. Directs employers to keep verification records of their employees' work eligibility through E-Verify.
31.Establishes a class 3 felony for failing to:
a)verify employment eligibility through E-Verify or
b)keep records of verifications...
|
|
There's More...
:: (1
Comments, 176 words in story)
|
|
Tue Apr 20, 2010 at 19:14:58 PM MST
|
( - promoted by Fong)
Our neighbors to the south west sure have their priorities in order, huh?
I wonder when the Arizona State legislature will change the state nickname from "The Grand Canyon State" to "The Orly Taitz State"?
The Arizona House on Monday voted for a provision that would require President Barack Obama to show his birth certificate if he hopes to be on the state's ballot when he runs for reelection. The House voted 31-22 to add the provision to a separate bill. The measure still faces a formal vote.
It would require U.S. presidential candidates who want to appear on the ballot in Arizona to submit documents proving they meet the constitutional requirements to be president. Phoenix Democratic Rep. Kyrsten Sinema said the bill is one of several measures that are making Arizona "the laughing stock of the nation." Mesa Republican Rep. Cecil Ash said he has no reason to doubt Obama's citizenship but supports the measure because it could help end doubt.
thinkprogress.org
Seriously, how can America survive when the majority of entire State Legislatures are this stupid?
More FAIL below the fold
|
|
There's More...
:: (8
Comments, 741 words in story)
|
|
Tue Apr 06, 2010 at 10:16:35 AM MST
|
|
This week, communities across Colorado will launch the Welcoming Colorado Initiative. This new project seeks to encourage immigrant and non-immigrant communities to engage in respectful dialogue, share experiences and correct misinformation through innovative programs.
|
|
There's More...
:: (0
Comments, 53 words in story)
|
|
|
|
Squarestate.net is owned by Open Communications Colorado, LLC. and is not responsible for the opinions expressed outside of our own.
|
|