Sat Dec 08, 2012 at 07:49:02 AM MST
| Our Esteemed Senator Mark Udall is up for re-election in 2014. As anyone who follows politics knows, that is right around the corner and the campaign has almost certainly begun. (We can thank Republicans like Karl Rove for the never-ending campaign.)
Riding Barack Obama's coattails 2008, Udall easily won his senate seat:
Obama took six of the 11 Western states, spreading the Democrats' apparent majority inland from the West Coast to include Colorado, Nevada and New Mexico.Here are the Colorado numbers from 2008:
Obama won with 54% and 1,288,576 votes.
Udall won with 53% and 1,230,994 votes.
(You'll note who got more votes than Mark Udall. This might be a standard occurrence in state votes, but it should not be disregarded in my humble opinion. A vote for Udall was mere millimeters away from a vote for Obama.)
Despite voters' clear mandate in 2008, and the obvious disgust with which they regarded Republicans nationally, our very wise Senator and his partner, both Udall and Michael Bennet, chose to use a tired, old strategy from the 90s: triangulation.
Triangulation has some logic behind it. And when wielded by the greatest politician of his generation, Bill Clinton, it seemed to work like magic. Democrats have been enamored of it since.
But there's a big "but" here that current Democrats in elected office haven't fully taken into account:
The 2008 move to the right by both Udall and Bennet immediately, and purposefully, hampered the ability of our newly elected president to act on his mandate and might've encouraged the historically belligerent behavior of Republicans:
| Zappatero :: The Feeling is Mutual: Udall dismissive of Voters....and Vice Versa
Colorado's two freshman senators, Mark Udall and Michael Bennet, are part of a self-described centrist group of 15 Democrats meeting regularly "seeking to restrain the influence of party liberals in the White House and on Capitol Hill," according to an account in Roll Call.
The group has a "shared commitment to pursue moderate, mainstream and fiscally sustainable policies across a range of issues, such as health care reform, the housing crisis, educational reform, and energy policy," according to a statement issued Wednesday by the group.
To be perfectly blunt: nice job, assholes.
Fast forward to now where we see the evisceration of Tea Party Candidates everywhere, the resounding loss of many candadates favored by, and those who favored, the Bowles-Simpson budget B.S., the near extinction of the Blue Dog/Conservadem legislator in congress that Bennet and Udall so hastily joined in 2008, and the clear electoral success of Democrats, including Barack Obama and several newly elected Democratic Senators, who proudly and unwaveringly proposed progressive solutions to our most intransigent problems.
And with all this Public Policy Polling found that Mark Udall's numbers were out of sync with the election that just took place:
Do you approve or disapprove of Senator Mark Udall's job performance?
Approve ...................36% (Down from 2008)
Not sure ..................31%
Generally speaking, if there was an election for Senate today, would you vote for Democrat Mark Udall or his Republican opponent?
Mark Udall................45% (Down from 2008)
Not sure................ .16%
So this is the environment in which Mark Udall has to decide if and how to run again for a seat in the United States Senate.
The progressive electoral shift in 2012 is unmistakable.
The clear mandate given by voters is undeniable.
The evidence of Conservadem/Blue Dog strategy failure is abundant.
Udall's overly conciliatory track, plaintive and misguided pleas for bipartisanship, constant identification with Republican policies and solutions (Simpson-Bowles, cuts to Medicare and Social Security) and unfounded timidity on progressive values leaves him a very clear choice in how to run and win the next election.
Will he do what makes sense for Democrats in 2014 or decide to go home and sit in a rocker on his porch?
Squarestate.net is owned by Open Communications Colorado, LLC. and is not responsible for the opinions expressed outside of our own.