How Squarestate Works
SquareState

Connect with Squarestate


Gotta Tip???
Go to the archive
Advertise on Squarestate
Online Voter Registration!





Search




Advanced Search


If You Care about Clean Energy, You Should Care About Midterm Elections Too

by: NRDC Action Fund

Wed Sep 01, 2010 at 06:46:44 AM MST


( - promoted by Fong)

August has passed without any major town hall eruptions, but that doesn’t mean it is a quiet time in American politics. Midterm-election campaigns are heating up, and it’s becoming clear that these races could determine what gets accomplished in the next Congress.

This includes what we do -- or don't do -- on clean energy and climate solutions.

Comprehensive climate legislation may be off the table right now, but the tenor and outcome of these elections will still have an enormous influence on our energy future. They will decide when we succeed in generating millions of green jobs and cleaning up our energy supply.

I urge all of you who care about these issues to get active in this campaign season. Candidates need to know that clean energy and global warming matter to voters - matter so much, in fact, that some lawmakers will lose their jobs because they didn't act boldly enough.

Go to campaign events, write to your candidates, and let them know that clean energy is a top priority for you. Whatever you do, don't sit this one out. We need your voices, and here is why.

NRDC Action Fund :: If You Care about Clean Energy, You Should Care About Midterm Elections Too
Lawmakers Need to Be Held Accountable. Back in July, the Senate decided not to vote on a clean energy and climate bill. This abject failure rests in the hands of Senate Republican Leadership and a small cluster of Democratic Senators, and they need to pay a price for blocking legislation that could have generated 2 million jobs.

NRDC is launching an accountability campaign targeting six Senators who could have made a difference with this bill, but declined to take action. These ads include a "Ticker" tracking the tons of global warming pollution dumped into the air and the number of jobs the Senate could have created in each state since the Senate refused to act on July 22. Already the ads have attracted national and local media attention and turned the heat up on these failed leaders.

The NRDC Action Fund urges you to conduct your own accountability efforts. Find out where your senators stood on the climate bill and tell them what you think about their position.

If there is an election in your state, find out what the candidates are saying -- or failing to say -- about investing in clean energy and confronting climate change. Go to campaign events to make sure your voice is heard out loud. It's time to remind lawmakers that clean energy supporters are a force to be reckoned with.

The Fossil Fuel Industry Isn't Letting Up. We need all the citizen power we can generate given the following numbers: In 2009, the oil and gas industry spent $174 million on lobbying the government. In just the first six months of this year, the industry spent another $75 million.

These deep pockets have purchased considerable influence in the campaigns. Last week, the New Yorker published a devastating expose about oil giant Koch Industries. According to the article, David Koch founded an astro-turf group called Americans for Prosperity. In addition to hosting more than 80 events opposing climate legislation, the group has vowed to spend $45 million more before the midterm elections.

Some of this money pays for attack ads like the one criticizing Representative Betsey Markey because she supported climate legislation - legislation that would have brought 30,000 jobs to Colorado and generated opportunities for farmers in her district. Markey is facing a competitive race this season, and these kinds of misleading attacks will make it even harder unless we stand up and set the record straight.

We will never match the oil industry in funding dollars, but we can use the tools of average voters to keep the pressure on: rallies, letters to the editor, social networking, calls to campaign headquarters, persistent questions about where the candidate stands on clean energy.

This Election Could Shape the Agenda for Years to Come. Remember the pivotal Congressional elections of 1994? Newt Gingrich's cronies stormed into Washington and turned health care reform into an issue lawmakers wouldn't touch for 16 years and kept climate legislation off the table for the entire time they were in power.

We cannot afford to let the same thing happen again with clean energy action. If Congress stalls on climate solutions for the next several years, the impacts of global warming will get worse and America will postpone the creation of 2 million new jobs.

It doesn't have to be this way. If we make clean energy a big enough campaign issue, and if we remind candidates that climate solutions are good for America's workers, our economy, and our national security, we can restore comprehensive clean energy action to a top legislative priority.

This blog originally appeared at The Markup.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
In light of the Tea Party's Actions
last year and the impacts they had on further watering down legislation (Health Insurance) and halting other legislation completely (Climate Change, Immigration, etc.), why weren't similar efforts organized and executed by progressive groups this year?

I'm not talking about the obscene signs and ridiculous screaming matches brought forth by the Tea Party's activists.  I'm talking about a national campaign of putting climate and clean energy activists in front of every member of Congress, Democrat and Republican alike.  Such an organized effort would have gone a long way toward ensuring action on this most critical of issues sooner rather than too late.

Was it lack of organization between environmental groups?  Was it lack of money from rich donors?  What would it have taken to put something like this together?  And since it wasn't done this year, could something be put together next year, especially in light of recent polling showing massive Democratic losses in one of the few functioning parts of government, the House?  Wouldn't that be something - large-scale and widespread climate and energy activist gatherings at Republican townhalls in 2011.  As much as I like 350.org's 10/10/10 planned day of action, a month of appearances at townhalls would likely have been more meaningful.


More broadly:
Colorado Confluence, Environmental Open Thread

We're all in this story together; let's write it well.

Squarestate.net is owned by Open Communications Colorado, LLC. and is not responsible for the opinions expressed outside of our own.
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Resources
Online Voter Registration!
Blog Roll
Abandon Your Car
American Indian Movement Colorado
Argusfest
The Bell
Big Media
Colorado Capitol Watch
Colorado Confluence Colorado Ethics Watch
Colorado Independent
Colorado Progressive Jewish News
Coloradopols
Congresspedia
Coyote Gulch
CritterThink
DemNotes
Denver Direct
Denver Voice
El Centro Humanitario
El Seminario
Great Education Colorado
La Voz
Lefty Blogs
Liberal Latina
Mario Solis-Marich
Mariowire
Outta the Cornfield
Pocho Blog
Politics West
Rocky Mountain Activist
Scholars and Rogues
Steam Powered Opinions
TriLakeDems
Ultimate Politics
Union Staff for Union
Democracy

Wash Park Prophet
WeatherDem - the blog
Wide Streets

Get Involved
Deep Green Resistance
Occupy Denver
Occupy Everywhere

What We Listen To
KUNC 91.5 FM
AM 760: Boulder's Progressive Talk
KCFR 1340 AM
KGNU 1390AM or 88.5FM
KRFC 88.9FM
Citizen Radio
MicCheckRadio
Democracy Now!
Progressive Voice
Colorado State Legislature

Reference
CoMaps.org
General Assembly
Prospector
Secretary of State
Tax Tracks
TRACER
WikiLeaks.org

Powered By
SoapBlox



Active Users
Currently 0 user(s) logged on.

SquareState.net is owned by Open Communications Colorado, LLC
Powered by: SoapBlox