In May 2007, several Colorado media outlets quoted
Caldara's statement equating Ritter's
mill
levy freeze with
"fiscal date rape," as Colorado
Media Matters pointed
out.
A high-stakes game of chicken between labor and
business is unfolding in Colorado
over four pro-union ballot measures and a right-to-work proposal, all of which
are scheduled to appear on the November ballot.
Labor leaders, desperate to kill Amendment 47, the
right-to-work measure, qualified four measures for the ballot last month that nearly
everyone agrees would cripple the state's economy. Union officials have agreed
to remove the four so-called "poison pills" from the ballot if
Jonathan Coors, a third-generation heir to the brewing fortune, removes
Amendment 47.
Problem solved, except that Mr. Coors, 28, refuses to
budge or even discuss sinking the amendment, which
would forbid making union membership or dues-paying a condition of employment.
Now the state's top Democratic political leaders, led
by Gov. Bill Ritter Jr., are negotiating with labor officials to pull the four
measures by the Oct. 2 deadline. They're not above quid pro quo: The latest
option calls for businesses to contribute between $2 million and $4 million to
the union coalition's campaign to defeat Amendment 47 in exchange for the
proposals' removal.
The entire spectacle has mesmerized the state's
political and business sectors, which anxiously await daily updates on the
talks. It also has opened up debate over whether Mr. Ritter is doing the right
thing by moving to protect the state's economy - or buying more trouble by
giving in to union blackmail.
As far as Jon Caldara is concerned,
it's the latter.
"You shouldn't negotiate with
terrorists," said Mr. Caldara, head of the free-market Independence
Institute in Golden, Colo.
"Unfortunately, business can be very
shortsighted," he said. "What's to stop [the unions] from doing this
next year? Or the next?"
-C.K.