How Squarestate Works
SquareState

Connect with Squarestate


Gotta Tip???
Go to the archive
Advertise on Squarestate
Online Voter Registration!





Search




Advanced Search


Should "End Times" Belief Disqualify You With Voters?

by: Bill Egnor AKA Something The Dog Said

Fri Jul 16, 2010 at 06:51:22 AM MST


I will be paddling out into deep water today and talk about belief and how it interacts with politics. Being a person of no faith, someone who finds the physical universe to be the only one we need worry about; it is perhaps not my bailiwick to talk about religion but I am going to do so anyway.

Back in the late '80s I remember reading about the members of a small apocalyptic cult whose leader told them to gather at their compound for the end of the world. It was short notice and the members were spread all over the country. One county in rural Nebraska was having a rash of people driving through at speeds exceeding 100 mph. When they were stopped by the police and issued a summons to come to court in two months they all just smiled. Why? Well they were absolutely sure that they would never make that court date, nor would anyone else in the world.  

Bill Egnor AKA Something The Dog Said :: Should "End Times" Belief Disqualify You With Voters?
It is an amusing story but there are some darker implications. A new Pew survey finds that 52 percent of folks living in the Southern U.S. believe that Jesus will return within the next forty years (read the whole survey here, it has a lot of other interesting factoids).

While that might sound all good and fine to those who don't follow Christian religions, the prophesied return of Jesus is not really that nice a thing. Oh, sure after he and God defeat the ungodly there is a 1,000 years of paradise on earth, but the time leading up to that is your run-of-the-mill  millennialism, floods, great wars, the Antichrist, mass destruction and death.

Now to the political dimension. With the high numbers of evangelicals in the South and the numbers who believe that Jesus will return in the next 40 years, where does that leave a politician who is one of the faithful? If you are sure, as are a solid majority of your constituents, that sometime in the next four decades your messiah will return how seriously will you treat the long term issues facing a nation?

Issues like peak oil and global climate change are not going to get a lot of attention, if like the cult members in the 80's you don't think you will be around for it , or you think that your god is going to come, kick some pagan ass, and make everything better with the wave of a hand. If you are millennialism in your views, then it is okay to go out and start wars or let long standing alliances decay, because Jesus is going to come and sweep the board clean anyway and soon, maybe next week.

You can also expect to see them really standing hard on the issues they think are a big deal to their god. After all no office is every as clean and efficient as when the CEO is coming for an inspection. You might see them, oh, really making a big deal about moral issues like abortion or full civil rights for gay citizens.

The thing is, shouldn't a belief in the end of the world and soon, be a disqualifying one for political office? If you think the world is ending and it is a good thing, doesn't that actually prevent you from working to make things better? Especially if your belief says that things have to get a lot worse before your particular deity shows up?

Given the pride so many of the Republican (and sadly some of the Democrats) in Congress seem to have in their Evangelical faith, shouldn't we ask them if they think we are in the End Times? It seems to me that this is an important piece of information to know. You could be the most dyed in the wool Liberal, but if you think the Flying Spaghetti Monster is going to come and destroy the world with his noodly appendages, well, you can't have my vote and you shouldn't get a vote from anyone else.  

The other reason to ask this question and get elected officials on the record is a purely "setting the cat among the pigeons" one. It is a real trick bag of a question, once asked the politician who does believe has two choices, a) say yes and then have to take the heat for believing the world is going to end or b) say no and take the heat from their constituents that really believe. To me, that looks like a win/win situation.

I don't really have anything against people having a religion. Like dandruff most people do have it, and like dandruff they seem to gain a lot of satisfaction from spending time and effort tending it (a paraphrase of Robert Heinlein). If that is how you want to spend your time, knock yourself out, it does not affect me, right up to the point where you start to try to govern our nation based on your religious belief and the prophesies it contains.

When a belief in the soon coming end of the world is one that drives your thinking on foreign policy and large scale ecological issues, then you have to step aside. It is not that your belief is wrong (though I certainly think it is) but rather that the nation as a whole does not hold your view points. The casual recklessness of someone who believes the world will end in the our lifetimes is too dangerous. To entrust such a person with the decision making power for a nation is to magnify this danger exponentially.

It is probably too late, there are lots and lots of elected Republicans who seem to be part of this millennial thinking. To expose them will be to only make them more popular with the voters who believe the same bunk. If believing that government can't do anything positive is not reason enough to disqualify them from public office, surely their belief in the near future end of the world will not do the trick. Still it is probably worth while to know if people like Sen. Inhofe of Oklahoma is really a bought and paid for shill for the Oil and Coal industries or if his actions are based on a firm conviction that it is too expensive to change because in a couple of decades it won't matter anyway.

Knowing where people are coming from on this positions makes it easier to move them or oppose them. It seems like a good time to ask all our Representatives and Senators if they think the end is near or that there is a future to work towards.

The floor is yours.  

Tags: , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

to answer your headline question: yes
next question?

On a somewhat related note, did you catch the daily show piece about building mosques a few days back?  They had a really interesting commentary on religious doctrine in politics.

Sorry Michael Bennet, but I'm a real person too


Uh...
yeah.

People can craft their beliefs... because you can't really stop them but it's particularly noxious when they are leaders who are campaigning to further enact their ideas. If they have a vested interest in the total destruction of the world and everything in existence, then I don't really support that.

But hey!!! LOOK IN MY EYES! There is a level of comfort in validating a mutual belief, esp if it's about knowing the future destruction of the world and what YOU can do to save your soul.  


Squarestate.net is owned by Open Communications Colorado, LLC. and is not responsible for the opinions expressed outside of our own.
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Resources
Online Voter Registration!
Blog Roll
Abandon Your Car
American Indian Movement Colorado
Argusfest
The Bell
Big Media
Colorado Capitol Watch
Colorado Confluence Colorado Ethics Watch
Colorado Independent
Colorado Progressive Jewish News
Coloradopols
Congresspedia
Coyote Gulch
CritterThink
DemNotes
Denver Direct
Denver Voice
El Centro Humanitario
El Seminario
Great Education Colorado
La Voz
Lefty Blogs
Liberal Latina
Mario Solis-Marich
Mariowire
Outta the Cornfield
Pocho Blog
Politics West
Rocky Mountain Activist
Scholars and Rogues
Steam Powered Opinions
TriLakeDems
Ultimate Politics
Union Staff for Union
Democracy

Wash Park Prophet
WeatherDem - the blog
Wide Streets

Get Involved
Deep Green Resistance
Occupy Denver
Occupy Everywhere

What We Listen To
KUNC 91.5 FM
AM 760: Boulder's Progressive Talk
KCFR 1340 AM
KGNU 1390AM or 88.5FM
KRFC 88.9FM
Citizen Radio
MicCheckRadio
Democracy Now!
Progressive Voice
Colorado State Legislature

Reference
CoMaps.org
General Assembly
Prospector
Secretary of State
Tax Tracks
TRACER
WikiLeaks.org

Powered By
SoapBlox



Active Users
Currently 1 user(s) logged on.

SquareState.net is owned by Open Communications Colorado, LLC
Powered by: SoapBlox