How Squarestate Works

Tell Colorado's Democratic Senators Yes to Filibuster Reform and No to the Not Dead Yet Grand Bargain

Contact Senator Mark Udall - (877) 768-3255 And Senator Michael Bennet - (866) 455-9866

SquareState

Connect with Squarestate


Gotta Tip???
Go to the archive
Advertise on Squarestate
Online Voter Registration!







Search




Advanced Search


Denver Public Schools' best reform often goes unheeded

by: Andrea Merida

Tue Aug 30, 2011 at 12:33:10 PM MST


( - promoted by Fong)

While the politics of education reform swirl all around us, it's important to keep clear on what works and what doesn't.  The good news is that the Denver Public Schools is actually doing very well in supporting a particular segment of our student population, English learners.  The confusing part is that we seem ready to ignore that fact and follow a path that is completely divergent from real, lasting reform.  The right path to close the achievement gap and provide opportunity for all Denver's students is clear, and we would do well to heed the evidence.

In 1999, the Department of Justice won a decision on behalf of the Congress of Hispanic Educators which asserted that the Denver Public Schools lacked adequate programs for students of limited English proficiency.  DPS was ordered to allow parents to choose either full Spanish-language instruction, sheltered instruction (English with instructions in Spanish) or complete English immersion for their children  (Click here to read those court documents).

Andrea Merida :: Denver Public Schools' best reform often goes unheeded
Around 35 percent of DPS students are classified as English language learners (ELLs).  Not all these students come from Spanish-speaking homes; they also speak Vietnamese, Arabic, Somali, Nepali, and Karen/Burmese.  Spanish-speaking students represent around 57 percent of DPS' ELL population.

The CSAPs taken in March 2011 show that "exited" ELLs, or those students who now are proficient enough to be placed in English-only classrooms, outperform district averages.  Keeping in mind that these standardized tests are only an indicator of performance, these students also have surpassed Asian/Pacific Islander and Anglo students in many categories.  These exited ELLs now take the CSAP in English.

The following graphs show the percentages of elementary-aged ELLs scoring at or above proficiency in subjects tested by CSAP.  ELLs outperform their Anglo counterparts in reading, writing and math and are very competitive with Asian students in science.

In middle school, ELLs outperform Asian students in reading, writing and math, though they lag behind them in science, as well as behind their Anglo counterparts in all areas.

Finally, for high schoolers, ELLs outperform the district average in all subjects except science.

DPS clearly successfully prepares ELLs for an English-speaking world and is rapidly closing the achievement gap.  In just a few short years, we will see impressive overall improvement in the rates of students testing at or above proficiency on the CSAPs.  Obviously, one of the best reform tools is the ELA program used in our neighborhood schools.  

However, few of the most recent innovation schools approved by the Board of Education feature ELA programs as found in our neighborhood schools.  The overwhelming majority of teachers hired at these new schools are uncertified and therefore do not have the credentials to teach in our ELA classrooms.  None of our charter schools provide parents the right to choose appropriate instruction for their children, nor do they offer any ELA program at all.  

If our ELA programs work so well for such a significant number of our students, why wouldn't we insist upon them in every school, or just require new schools to meet certain criteria?

There is also the issue of civil rights.  The 1999 court decision also found that DPS was in violation of the Educational Opportunities Act of 1974, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, which guarantee all students the right to equal educational opportunity.  If education truly is the civil rights issue of our time, we should ensure that every school, public, charter or innovation, meets or exceeds our ELA program found in neighborhood schools.

Our ELA program is there for the taking, and all a parent need do is ask.  There is no application or lottery, only an aptitude test to make recommendations to the parent.  There is no special grant needed to pay for it; it's a normal expenditure in our budget.  But in our pell-mell hurtle toward "innovation," we have stripped away opportunity from the children that most need support.  For non-English speaking parents, there is no longer a choice.  ELLs now desperately hunt for a school that could serve them or just simply flounder without support.  We have become a district that creates diasporas, not opportunity.

The path to closing the achievement gap and, therefore, a strong school district, is to ensure that all our students have equitable opportunities to robust and challenging academics.  We have to reform schools according to the needs of the kids actually in our schools, not for kids we might wish we had.

This November, the Board will consider approval of a few new schools.  Denver residents, please tell your elected board representatives at board@dpsk12.org to first carefully consider the actual needs of our children and to put sound educational policy in place of ideology or buzzwords.  It is, after all, for the kids.

P.S.: You can read up on other policy issues, sign up for my newsletter, etc., at my website, www.andreamerida.com.  Proud to be the only school board member in Colorado with an outreach-focused website!

Tags: , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

All I know about you
is that you made your predecessor cry, that she continues to cry because of it, that what you did to make her cry was perfectly legal (how else could you have been legally sworn in), that that incident has helped to spawn a narrative about you that you are a fiesty Latina who is a hack because you take on reformers because they move too quickly to be accountable.

It is because of all of this that I must racistly join the herd and say you are bad. BAD!


Andrea takes on the school "reformers"
because they are not really "reforming" the school systems, but rather they are plundering and destroying the school systems.  Thank God we have leaders such as Andrea Merida who are willing to step and fight for the best interests of the people.

By the way, Hallowed, by dint of your support for the school "reform" scammers, you're hereby presumed to be a no-account fascist stooge unless and until you prove otherwise.

Also: Any politician who cries about losing an election fair and square probably doesn't have the requisite fortitude to conduct the people's business competently anyway, so it's a doubly good thing for all concerned that Andrea won that election. Sympathies to the loser of that election, but there's important work that needs to be done, and the people elected Andrea to do that work.


Any reason you're refusing to pay back the over $7000 you improperly billed DPS?
DPS isn't exactly awash in cash, yet when you had a $5000 spending limit, you spent over $12000. Others who overspent by several hundred are paying it back -- but your response was: "No, I don't intend to pay anything back because these are all legitimate community engagement kinds of things, and there is a lot of professional development lumped into that." The money you improperly billed DPS and now refuse to return includes this: "at least $4,000 of Merida's total, close to a third, was spent on credit-card charges at fast food establishments, restaurants, and coffee shops." Fine, you were meeting constituents at a restaurant; did you really have to bill DPS for your meals? Is allowing you to eat while chatting with constituents, rather than at home before or after the meeting, really a priority for DPS money?

Here's the link: http://www.ednewscolorado.org/...

SquareShills, all four of you who post here, please feel free to argue why this doesn't show Merida to be a cheap crook.


Raymond, you a weaselly little corporate psychopath.
Ms. Merida does an incredible amount of public outreach with her constituents.  The amount of money being discussed does not sound unreasonable at all to me, other than the fact that a $5,000 limit is ridiculously low to begin with.

Last time you darkened our doorway, it was to point out some sort of supposed syntactical error that you tried to make a huge deal out of because you were incapable of rationally debating the substance of Ms. Merida's essay. And clearly you still got nothin'. You're still a petty little dickhead.

What do you have against the institution of public education anyway, Raymond?  Why are you on the side that's trying to rape this cornerstone of American democracy? Do you have any conscience at all, Raymond?  


[ Parent ]
I like that you have such a hard on
for fucking with Merida. It helps to lend credibility to her cause.  

[ Parent ]
Now be nice
that's the first hard on he's had since greasing gooks in Nam.

[ Parent ]
Anyway, the corpy slimeball known as Raymond
doesn't even know enough about math to insert commas into figures of 1,000 or greater: "$7000, $12000, $5000" ... which proves beyond a doubt, via Raymond's own Scientology-esque "reasoning," that he's a fucking idiot and a psychopathic Karl Rove devotee.  

So, do any corpies from CorporatePols dare to debate Andrea Merida on substantive education-policy issues? Of course not -- if they were to do that, they would be exposed for the Vichy dirtbags they are, complicit in the pillaging of our public schools and the massive diversion of our public education resources to Neil Bush and other corporate oligarchs.  Yep, dirtbags. Flaming dirtbags.


[ Parent ]
UPDATE: Andrea has announced
that she will pay back the expense-account overages.  

Paying back board expenditures

Just a quick note to tell you that I've decided to pay back what I overspent from our board allotment.  I want to be very clear, however, that I did not personally benefit from any of the expenses.  There is no personal enrichment here, only spending to outreach to you and to become a better board member.

The board president and I will go over what that amount actually is, since there's still a lot of confusion about what should be part of the allotment and what is "traditionally" covered as a function of our duties.  Once we get the accounting straightened out, I will know what the amount is and will work to pay it back, however painful.  It's only right.

The board president and I are also working together to put some policy in place.  Nothing should be left to memory, and our procedures need to be put down on paper as we transition for the next board that will be elected in November.  We still don't have a system to help members track what they're spending, and it's not fair to anyone (especially to you) to leave things so loose.

Please let me know if you have questions or concerns, as always.

I think that's the right decision, but I also think the $5,000 annual limit on expenses related to her public service is appallingly low, especially when you weigh it against the limitless corporate funding that goes into anti-public-schools propaganda such as the Fox-like Education "News" Colorado and CorporatePols.



Squarestate.net is owned by Open Communications Colorado, LLC. and is not responsible for the opinions expressed outside of our own.
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Resources
Online Voter Registration!
Blog Roll
Abandon Your Car
American Indian Movement Colorado
Argusfest
The Bell
Big Media
Colorado Capitol Watch
Colorado Confluence Colorado Ethics Watch
Colorado Independent
Colorado Progressive Jewish News
Coloradopols
Congresspedia
Coyote Gulch
CritterThink
DemNotes
Denver Direct
Denver Voice
El Centro Humanitario
El Seminario
Great Education Colorado
La Voz
Lefty Blogs
Liberal Latina
Mario Solis-Marich
Mariowire
Outta the Cornfield
Pocho Blog
Politics West
Rocky Mountain Activist
Scholars and Rogues
Steam Powered Opinions
TriLakeDems
Ultimate Politics
Union Staff for Union
Democracy

Wash Park Prophet
WeatherDem - the blog
Wide Streets

Get Involved
Deep Green Resistance
Occupy Denver
Occupy Everywhere

What We Listen To
KUNC 91.5 FM
AM 760: Boulder's Progressive Talk
KCFR 1340 AM
KGNU 1390AM or 88.5FM
KRFC 88.9FM
Citizen Radio
MicCheckRadio
Democracy Now!
Progressive Voice
Colorado State Legislature

Reference
CoMaps.org
General Assembly
Prospector
Secretary of State
Tax Tracks
TRACER
WikiLeaks.org

Powered By
SoapBlox



Active Users
Currently 0 user(s) logged on.

SquareState.net is owned by Open Communications Colorado, LLC
Powered by: SoapBlox