How Squarestate Works
SquareState

Connect with Squarestate


Gotta Tip???
Go to the archive
Advertise on Squarestate
Online Voter Registration!





Search




Advanced Search


Too little, Too late from Bennet and Udall

by: Zappatero

Thu Aug 04, 2011 at 13:02:17 PM MST


( - promoted by Fong)

Gawd these guys are pathetic:

WASHINGTON - Colorado Democratic Sens. Michael Bennet and Mark Udall? both voted Tuesday to couple a debt-ceiling increase with more than $2 trillion in cuts and deficit reduction over 10 years - a compromise that disappointed them.

Udall said it wasn't the bill he wanted because it didn't include revenues or elimination of tax breaks for billion-dollar corporations, which would have ensured "that the wealthiest among us will help shoulder the burden of balancing our books."

[...] "It will protect our economy from crisis and make a down payment on our debt, two critical first steps."

Bennet called the last four weeks in Washington "disappointing."

Those are two critical first steps, but the most important would be to have the federal government spend more money to actually stimulate the economy.

Both Michael Bennet and Mark Udall have caved on issue after issue since coming to office. Both complain about the results, but both have done nothing that would have changed those results. If they are being team players on the Obama re-election campaign, they better figure out this crap ain't working and that President Obama, sadly, may end up the primary casualty in Mitch McConnell's terror campaign:  

Zappatero :: Too little, Too late from Bennet and Udall
U.S. stocks plunged on Tuesday as fears about a weak U.S. economy were inflamed after investors got another disappointing economic report - this time on consumer spending.

The selloff was so broad and so deep it pushed the S&P 500 into negative territory for the year and bond yields to their lowest levels in nine months.

"Now that we have solved the debt ceiling issue the market has moved onto the other data, which has taken a significant turn for the worse," said Ryan Detrick, senior technical strategist with Schaeffer's Investment Research.

The Dow Jones industrial average (INDU) plunged 266 points, or 2.2%, to close at 11,867. The Dow was dragged lower by the industrial and manufacturing heavyweights of the 30-member index: Alcoa (AA, Fortune 500), General Electric (GE, Fortune 500), United Technologies (UTX, Fortune 500) and Boeing (BA, Fortune 500).

This was the eighth-straight day of declines for the Dow -- a losing streak not seen since October 2008, when the financial system was in the depths of the crisis. The Dow has fallen roughly 6.7% since the sell-off began on July 22.

NOTE: Dow down 512 today.

As Atrios says, the market shouldn't be an indicator and shouldn't be the primary tool to gauge whether some economic policy is working. But that's what they use it for in Washington and by that measure this deal is a P.O.S.

There's plenty of data, guiding principle, history on hand to convince voters that this deal was not going to work. Bennet and Udall couldn't communicate that to citizens and have failed to break the anti-tax, anti-government, anti-worker and anti-middle class jihad of the Tea Party Republicans.

Both our senators have failed at their most basic job as a politician: convincing citizens of the proper policy with facts and rhetoric. But they will continue to get paid their $180,000 salaries and receive their wonderful health care as the rest of us dip into another full-blown recession. If our senators are too cowardly to do the work required by the job they ran for - and were given by Colorado's citizens - they should resign and find something less demanding. With a Republican at least we know what we'd get.

With these guys, all we know is there isn't a single Democratic principle they'll stand for.

Tags: , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

seems a bit harsh
I'm not sure what you want from Bennet and Udall.  Did you want them to vote against the bill and endanger the economy even more than it is now?  Do you expect Bennet and Udall to "break the ... jihad of the Tea Party Republicans" on their own?  I understand that the deal is bad; trust me, I'm mad about it too.  Still, I also understand that the alternative is worse, and faced with the vote our senators were faced with, I would probably vote yes just to keep the economy alive and fight another day.

You make a big deal about Bennet and Udall not communicating the realities of the deal to citizens.  While I agree their communication and that of the whole party could be improved, since when is that their primary job description?  Their job is to communicate our needs and realities to Washington, and I do see the short term need to avoid hitting the debt ceiling as part of that.  Besides, even if they communicated perfectly and got the whole state on their side, the politics of Washington would be exactly the same.  That can only change in the next election, and until then we've got to deal with the fascists on the right as best we can.

One last thing:  How on earth is it constructive to focus on  a primary challenger to Obama?  And how does it help things to make unfounded, hyperbolic statements like "there isn't a single Democratic principle they'll stand for"?  Let's not forget that the primary reason we're in this mess is because the Republicans gained back the House in 2010.  For all of the frustrating politics and concessions Democrats have made, it would not be better to cede power to the Republicans, it would be much worse.  As we do the important task of calling our leaders and representatives to account and exhorting them to do better, let's at least acknowledge that when it comes to the national theater that we must stand united with them against the conservative threat to our country.


Happy to hold them to whatever standard is available
but I don't see how they get high marks for any standard out there.  I would love to see concrete examples of how they performed in "comminucating our needs and realities to Washington".  Did they offer up a stand-alone debt increase bill and push for it publicly?  Were they at the forefront of demanding increased revenues, ending costly occupations of foreign nations, or truly reforming health care to include a universal system that reduces deficit spending?  No, they have done none of those things.  And according to Bennet and Udall, one of the primary reasons they wanted to be elected was so they could change Washington.  They haven't done much on their signature issue, have they?  No, they sold Coloradans on their charisma and expected not to have to follow through on their nonsensical promises.  But when Zapp and others pointed out how silly their "changing Washington" talking points were, attacks were levied for being too pessimistic, etc.  Critics of those holding the Gentlemen from Colorado accountable want their cake and then eat it too.

The reason we're in this mess isn't just that Republican Teabaggers gained back the House in 2010.  It's that Obama and Democrats promised the moon and stars in 2008, then didn't lift fingers to deliver on those promises.  They have only to look in the mirror to determine who's at fault for the state of affairs of Washington politics in 2011.

Zapp is in no way advocating that it "would be better to cede power to the Republicans".  Such a claim is a strawman.  Holding current Democrats accountable and advocating for electing better Democrats should never be characterized as anything different.  Settling for the lesser of two evils for decades has now resulted in the nation's credit rating being downgraded, which will stifle economic growth for quarters to come.  At some point, settling has to be seen for the farce that it is by a majority of Democrats.  I can only hope it happens before our economy is shattered.


[ Parent ]
Squarestate.net is owned by Open Communications Colorado, LLC. and is not responsible for the opinions expressed outside of our own.
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Resources
Online Voter Registration!
Blog Roll
Abandon Your Car
American Indian Movement Colorado
Argusfest
The Bell
Big Media
Colorado Capitol Watch
Colorado Confluence Colorado Ethics Watch
Colorado Independent
Colorado Progressive Jewish News
Coloradopols
Congresspedia
Coyote Gulch
CritterThink
DemNotes
Denver Direct
Denver Voice
El Centro Humanitario
El Seminario
Great Education Colorado
La Voz
Lefty Blogs
Liberal Latina
Mario Solis-Marich
Mariowire
Outta the Cornfield
Pocho Blog
Politics West
Rocky Mountain Activist
Scholars and Rogues
Steam Powered Opinions
TriLakeDems
Ultimate Politics
Union Staff for Union
Democracy

Wash Park Prophet
WeatherDem - the blog
Wide Streets

Get Involved
Deep Green Resistance
Occupy Denver
Occupy Everywhere

What We Listen To
KUNC 91.5 FM
AM 760: Boulder's Progressive Talk
KCFR 1340 AM
KGNU 1390AM or 88.5FM
KRFC 88.9FM
Citizen Radio
MicCheckRadio
Democracy Now!
Progressive Voice
Colorado State Legislature

Reference
CoMaps.org
General Assembly
Prospector
Secretary of State
Tax Tracks
TRACER
WikiLeaks.org

Powered By
SoapBlox



Active Users
Currently 0 user(s) logged on.

SquareState.net is owned by Open Communications Colorado, LLC
Powered by: SoapBlox