How Squarestate Works

Tell Colorado's Democratic Senators Yes to Filibuster Reform and No to the Not Dead Yet Grand Bargain

Contact Senator Mark Udall - (877) 768-3255 And Senator Michael Bennet - (866) 455-9866

SquareState

Connect with Squarestate


Gotta Tip???
Go to the archive
Advertise on Squarestate
Online Voter Registration!







Search




Advanced Search


How cronyism and incompetence are destroying the Democrats in Colorado

by: MikeD1970

Fri Nov 05, 2010 at 13:51:47 PM MST


( - promoted by Fong)

As Democrats/progressives we don't have a lot to be proud of after this election.  Yes Hickenlooper won the governorship, but it's not like there was any doubt.  We barely held on to the Senate seat, but in doing so cost ourselves a lot more.  This diary is about how the Colorado democrats nearly lost everything because of incompetence and decisions made because of personal allegiances over professional ability.

This is going to be long, but I think the full story needs to be heard to understand...

MikeD1970 :: How cronyism and incompetence are destroying the Democrats in Colorado
First I just wanted to say that for those of you who followed my diaries/comments over the campaign I stopped blogging for awhile mostly out of loyalty to the party and progressive agenda.  I was (and am) no fan of Michael Bennet, but I put that aside and voted how I had to in order to make sure the Ken Bucks didn't get into office.  Staying off the blogs seemed like the best option, as I really couldn't bring myself to say much nice about Bennet besides him not being Buck.  To be clear, this isn't about Bennet or even much about the Bennet campaign.  I'm thankful not to have Buck as Senator.

Back during the primary the Colorado Democratic Party had to hire an executive director to run the day to day operations -- normal for a campaign year.  Chairwoman Pat Waak chose the wife of Bennet campaign Coordinator Adam Dunstone: Jenni Peek-Dunstone...a decision that sparked quite a few questions about the party's neutrality.

If that was the only thing, it wouldn't be a big deal -- Jenni had worked house majority and had a good reputation on her own (actually probably better than her husband's).  The next move was far worse.

The "coordinated campaign" is the party's effort to elect dems up and down a ticket -- it makes for the bulk of the GOTV and other late activities.  Usually a party will try and take input from the various campaigns to ensure that it doesn't essentially become an offshoot of any one campaign.  This last year, the party claimed to have done a national search, but ended up selecting another partner of a Bennet staffer -- this time their deputy campaign manager's fiance.  This was, of course, still during a primary in which it wasn't clear if Bennet would even be the nominee.

After the primary, the Bennet camp actually made some sensible decisions.  They knew what they were and were not good at.  They were good at media and money, but bad at field.  A strong campaign knows its strengths and weaknesses.  In this case, the Bennet campaign handed over the keys of their field operation almost entirely to the coordinated -- staff shifted off Bennet payroll and to the party, direct voter contact started would be handled more by the party, etc.  Smart move for Bennet, but a move that helped destroy other democratic campaigns in Colorado.

Normally a coordinated campaign staff runs GOTV and field because they know how to -- in fact the whole idea is that they are qualified to do this and the campaigns trust them.  This last election, nothing could be further from the truth.

The dems coordinated campaign decided they also couldn't actually do field (apparently just passing the buck so to speak), so they decided to hire an obscure consulting firm called Terra Strategies.  Now Terra's website looks like it was build by a high school kid running for class president, and none of their staff had experience in Colorado.  They were hired simply because of personal relations with the coordinated campaign director.  This is where everything truly starts to fall apart for the dems.

Only a few weeks before election day (and around when mail in ballots are going out), Terra had no actual field operation.  They had been given several hundred thousand from the DSCC, and coordinated had money from nearly every major race as well, yet no one was actually doing anything with it.  Hickenlooper was going to cruise to victory, Bennet ditched most of their field operation to coordinated, and other statewide races (Kennedy, Buescher, Garnett) trust in the party effort out of necessity (those three being swept by the Republicans of course).

So we have an out of state consulting group with ties to the out of state coordinated director with ties to the out of state deputy campaign manager for Bennet -- none of which have any vested interest in helping elect democrats in Colorado (besides Bennet of course).

At this point, Terra apparently realizes they need staff in order to run canvasses (who knew?) and find a bunch of unemployed former Romanoff staff to actually do the work of crunching numbers, hiring canvassers, and knocking on doors -- all in about 4 days.  Terra of course takes a large cut of the over budget for themselves...apparently for the administrative costs.

Now, several days after the election, Terra is not returning phone calls of people who they owe money (namely all those canvassers who pushed Michael Bennet over the finish line).

Not paying your employees in a timely fashion is bad enough, but there is a much larger problem with this scenario: the people running the democrats efforts simply were not qualified and were hired only because of who they knew.

Kennedy and Buescher lost in large part because the organization that was supposed to be there for them simply wasn't.  There was no real "coordinated" campaign -- there were incompetent out of state firms raking in money while doing literally nothing for the campaigns.  The "coordinated" also did almost nothing for the congressional races, only making a token effort in CD3 at the 11th hour.

RBI strategies should be embarrassed for their part in this as well.  They are Colorado's only large progressive firm left (since David Kenney dropped off the scene when Ritter did), and they had the senior role on both Kennedy and Buescher -- Democrats lost both statewide offices on RBI's watch.  RBI, of course, was also the main consulting group for Bennet and Partner Craig Hughes ran Bennet's campaign.

So we are left with a situation in which wave after wave of incompetent people who simply hired each other all sucked up millions in resources only to lose 2 congressional seats, 2 statewide offices, and 1 chamber of the Colorado legislature -- only Bennet was able to narrowly squeak out a victory...in large part because a dozen or so former Romanoff people put aside their issues to quickly create an actual canvass GOTV effort.

There is a lot of conversation about how Dick Wadhams is hiding in a corner and will probably be removed (and Repubs are smart to do so -- he's an idiot).  Democrats better look at their own situation too though -- Dems took a beating they shouldn't have: Kennedy and Buescher just didn't have anyone looking out for them.

Did I mention that Terra is now avoiding calls from the actual Coloradans they hired to do the work they couldn't?  Klassy.

Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Thanks for the promotion
I wasn't sure how this would be received, but frankly I'm pissed about losing seats we shouldn't of while these jackasses lined their pockets with money that should have actually helped elect democrats.

Now here's a little story I got to tell...

I'm very glad you posted this.


[ Parent ]
It isn't about electing Democrats is it?
It's about USING Democrats to elect your buddies! The only real democrats involved with the party are the ones at the bottom of the heap, the grassroots. Every Democrat in Colorado except for the ones who run everything should feel incredibly used.  

[ Parent ]
Sympathy for your sentiment, but....
The real issue for Democrats isn't about the grassroots Party loyalists, it is about the middle and lower class who don't see the Democrats looking out for their interests.

Let's not think of the problem in such a self-centered way. We Progressives and Party loyalists voted, right? We aren't the problem, even if we feel dissed.

Election (s) were lost due to Democratic Party establishment failure to engage the voters who should be Democratic.


[ Parent ]
Thanks for the promotion
I wasn't sure how this would be received, but frankly I'm pissed about losing seats we shouldn't of while these jackasses lined their pockets with money that should have actually helped elect democrats.

Now here's a little story I got to tell...

Thank you, Mike
That's shocking information, and yet not surprising.

Terra/Romanoff/Democratic staffers are used to not getting paid on time
Don't you know that these dedicated people are supposed to take one for the team every single time the "team" decides payroll is not a priority come payday? It's just part of the invisible contract everyone signs with their energetic unicorn horn that when you work for something you believe in, you're paid in privilege dollars. /snark

/raging anger

Fuck consultants like Terra Strategies. If they don't like the accusations that they're screwing over their employees so they can run with the money, then they need to get their shit together. I swear to GOD it isn't that hard.

And fuck under-qualified people being hired because of the people they know. As Democrats, we're supposed to be above that because we're supposed to be getting shit done, not sucking each others' asses which is what this reeks of.

Attention staffers who work because they believe in it: no good deed goes unpunished.  


Righteous fury is a good look on you, Fong
n/t

[ Parent ]
Don't encourage her ;^0 nt


[ Parent ]
the money issue sucks, but I think there is a much much larger problem
I would hope that Terra comes through in paying all their canvassers -- if not it does become a news story in the mainstream media (whats left of it in Colorado).

The much larger issue as I see it is how Kennedy and Buescher lost their seats because there was no real coordinated campaign to help them -- it cost us several legislative seats as well.

I think we need to clean house down at CDP HQ.

Now here's a little story I got to tell...


[ Parent ]
Could not agree more
The issue comes down to the fact that organizations like Terra were more concerned with helping the party save face after the stolen primary than actually winning a majority of elections.

Too many people are happy that we kept one Senate seat when we lost 4 other major seats and a chamber of the state legislature. We have lost the big picture.

Don't know why we kept the last congressional seat, perhaps that persons staff and volunteers had to go around the coordinated campaign to do it?

But why would it matter to organizations like Terra or the State Party? They can say they "bucked the national" trends because they elected Bennet.

Colorado Democrats went down in flames this year in order to elect Bennet. We were not playing strategically, we were playing pridefully. And now, we've lost.  


[ Parent ]
Oh yes, I agree and I think
I tried to make that point with the whole getting shit done -bit. This is not a unique story and people have been telling me more and more about how common it is. A lot of people just accept it.

Every time I try to recruit someone to something, they very astutely ask "am I going to get paid? No really, am I going to get paid?" and I then I have a moment where I think that's a perfectly rational fear to have because I've had enough experience to know how flakey people in politics are.

But overall it is just an indication of how screwed up the rituals and rites and standards we (don't) have are. All organizations have their quirks and their faults but man, I've seen some excessive shit go down and there are people who need to be put on notice.

If these types deals are being made, with millions of dollars and several races at stake, well this is a big scandal and it's not going to get fixed until someone does something about it, which is what you've done by starting this conversation. Thank you.  


[ Parent ]
"There was no real coordinated campaign"
I'm going to call bullshit.

I understand your anger about staffers not being paid. That isn't right.

That said, there was a FULLY functional coordinated campaign operating. Your attempts to slander staff are equally unfounded.


[ Parent ]
Uh,.. what???
Where's the slander?  

[ Parent ]
Ya, trying to tie Bennet staffers into
how Terra Strategies paid (or, I guess, didn't pay) their workers.

Imagine for a second that you were a staffer for a campaign. Would you want your name dragged through the mud for some BS that an outside organization pulled?

Talk about a candidate all you want, Fong, but staffers work too hard to get their names pulled into BS by some bitter shill.


[ Parent ]
you mean the people who called "on behalf of Michael Bennet?"
no -- that's not a coordinated campaign.  In nearly every county the phone scripts talked only about Bennet, despite the resources being intended for the entire ticket.

Now here's a little story I got to tell...

[ Parent ]
You really have no idea what you're talking about
The coordinated advocates for all the federal races in a given area. If you took a look at the scripts for, say, CD-6 (which I have) they all included John Flerlage's name. I know, you were "too busy on the blogs" to make it into one of the coordinated's 20 or so offices. But those weren't real, right?

You actually think that the coordinated campaign didn't include federal candidate's names as some sort of conspiracy to have them lose?!

I know you're making an effort to rationalize why some of our federal candidates lost, but it sounds truly insane to someone who has knowledge of the inner workings of the coordinated campaign. The coordinated staff worked harder than you ever have in your entire life to make sure Democrats held those seats.


[ Parent ]
There's a difference between saying "Bennet" vs "Democrat"
when on the line. That's what I understand happened.  

[ Parent ]
actually I wasn't on the blogs for weeks
I was busy trying to elect democrats and support progressive values.  You can check my comment history if you don't believe me.

Now here's a little story I got to tell...

[ Parent ]
It wasn't fixed until last minute
I know for a fact that 3 weeks before the election the CD 3 Coordinated scripts said "Bennet" when I volunteered for him. The staffers there handed me a stack of Bennet lit only. I had to ask for Salazar stuff and then they go, "Oh right! But make sure you get the Senate ID! If the conversation goes well, you can move onto the Congressional!"

It was never changed to, "calling on behalf of Senator Bennet and Congressman Salazar" but finally in the last week got changed to, "Calling on behalf of the Colorado Democratic Party" where we were still encouraged to only talk Senate, then hopefully, mention that there even WAS a congressional race. I felt like I wasn't allowed to talk about my own Congressman when I went to make calls for him. Now I'm stuck with Tipton for at least 2 years.

No, the Coordinated does not necessarily advocate for the state candidates, but in 2008 the coordinated scripts were much more about, "Vote Democratic!" then, "Vote Udall and neglect everyone else."  


[ Parent ]
You Need to Challenge Your County Party Leadership
I know for a fact that 3 weeks before the election the CD 3 Coordinated scripts said "Bennet" when I volunteered for him. The staffers there handed me a stack of Bennet lit only. I had to ask for Salazar stuff and then they go, "Oh right! But make sure you get the Senate ID! If the conversation goes well, you can move onto the Congressional!"

If that was the case, you need to organize with your other county pcp's and get to Reorg next Spring.  If you are not a voting member, get yourself appointed to your county party leadership in a role which will permit your voting or get a proxy from one who won't attend, for whom you are qualified to carry, and run for a position in the county leadership.  I know it's a difficult job, and that there are entrenched groups, but this kind of thing can be rooted out and replaced by competent leadership.


[ Parent ]
Don't Get Mad, Get Even
Robert Kennedy was right.  Though that does not mean that "getting even" will be accomplished without a lot of work, failures and retries, on your part or the part of any reform group.  

You do have control over this kind of thing.


[ Parent ]
We Changed the Scripts for Our Denver Volunteers
Though the written scripts were less down-ballot supportive than most of us would condone, we who volunteered for phonebanking sessions added words to our calls outlining the importance of full down-ballot voting, including NO on the numbered issues.  It seemed to work in Denver, as the drop-off we traditionally see seems to have diminished.  No one in the office gave us a problem, but we were a pretty adamant bunch, and the campaign needed our help. :)

Something to remember about coordinated campaigns and their paid staff: these are fairly inexperienced people who are paid to help, but who may not understand any of the nuances of a local race, including a CD as well as state or local races. They are being paid to promote a candidate or other group's objectives and to fulfill their manager's plan. However, we can all work in a sensible way and meet all our objectives with a little good will on both sides. We've found it best to welcome the full-time help and to work with them as far as possible. When we find it ineffective, we go off on our own and let the paid help follow the directions they were given.  I think that there has been an improvement between the two factions over the past 4 cycles.  Maybe we'll be better next time. We sure will try to improve.  

Thanks to all who worked on the GOTV effort and who voted down ballot.  That work negated a lot of money and commentary which would ordinarily discourage many.  Y'all were great.  


[ Parent ]
fyi, This diary was cross-posted at CorporatePols
So I was watching that to see what the official crony-turf-protection strategy would be, and what they have done is to simply delete the diary.    

Their rationale:
Colorado Corporate Pols does not permit unsourced, potentially defamatory accusations.  

No, of course they don't, other than the other 99.998% of the time that they allow and encourage it.


[ Parent ]
Here's full CorporatePols spin:
*Colorado Pols Note: This diary has been deleted. The content was largely complaints and accusations about a company allegedly not paying wages. As per our posting policies, Colorado Pols does not permit unsourced, potentially defamatory accusations.  

Read the diary, and then read CorporatePols' gross mischaracterization of what the diary is "largely" about. In reality, it's certainly much, much bigger than just the complaints about unpaid wages.


[ Parent ]
thank you
I had the same thought and just posed that question to Pols.  My guess is that they don't like the parts that reflect badly on their buddies at RBI either.

Now here's a little story I got to tell...

[ Parent ]
This whole thing is just teeming with implication, is it not?
I've spoken with some people...

And if Terra would like to sue, I'm interested in going forth with that conversation.  


[ Parent ]
CorporatePols' selective invocation of journalistic "standards"
We only have to go back a few days to find this front-paged item at CorporatePols, written by the shadowy "Pols" themselves:

Kathleen Curry Shenanigans?
by: Colorado Pols
Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 14:53:34 PM MDT

We've just received reports in the last few minutes about potentially illegal electioneering activity outside polling places in Colorado House District 61. Embattled write-in candidate Kathleen Curry and her campaign are reportedly handing out pens labeled with her name outside polling places, allegedly inside the 100-foot limit surrounding polling locations where electioneering is prohibited. They're specifically instructing voters to take these pens and vote with them.

Sure, it's tough to get people to spell your name correctly as a write-in, but if this is how she's resolving that problem, well, it's a problem. We're told that a complaint has already been filed, local election judges are involved as witnesses, and the Democratic Party is a couple of confirmatory phone calls from sounding full alarm--we'll update when we have more information.

Gee Pols, who were your sources? Where are your links? Where are your attempts to get comment from the Curry campaign before publishing these unsourced allegations?

More background here on Kathleen Curry and her candidacy, which provides insight into why CorporatePols was mobilized to do this gratuitous hatchet job on her.

But remember:

Colorado Pols Corporate Pols does not permit unsourced, potentially defamatory accusations.


[ Parent ]
By the way, (pardon the tangent)
Despite CorporatePols' malignant attempts to portray Kathleen Curry as nothing but a nuisance fringe candidate, she actually has a decent chance at being declared the winner of that race.



[ Parent ]
Nice selective quote there
How about putting out the whole truth.  They own the site, and they're up front about this particular policy.

They say

We take responsibility for anything written under the Colorado Pols name, sourced or not. We do not, and will not, take responsibility for unsourced negative attacks by any other user.

They also say

We are not the place for you to attempt to float negative,
damaging rumors about candidates.  We reserve that prerogative for ourselves.


So, you can whine and call them silly names because you don't like the rules they enforce on their property.  But you can't lie and make their policy something other than it it.


[ Parent ]
It was a verbatim copy-and-paste
of their stated explanation for deleting the diary. Nice try though.  If they were misstating their own supposed policy, you should take it up with them.

[ Parent ]
p.s.
@Timberlinegirl  - The excerpt that you posted wasn't really their supposed policy either:
We are not the place for you to attempt to float negative,   damaging rumors about candidates.  We reserve that prerogative for ourselves.

It's actually a satirical alteration of their supposed policy.  

[ Parent ]
Also,
No one is saying Pols didn't have the right to delete the diary. What's at issue is the validity of their explanation for doing so and their curiously blatant mischaracterization of what the diary was all about.

[ Parent ]
There Ought to Be an Investigation
That is, if we had an Attorney General who gave a damn, but wait, oh yeah, that's right. The Attorney General who would've given a damn didn't get elected for lack of support from the Party, etc.! As a former Romanoff Staffer, I got a call from Terra, and boy am I glad I turned them down!

"The most important political office is that of private citizen."
 - Justice Louis D. Brandeis


How Did Stan Garnett Not Have Party Support?
Stan was able to use various party offices and equipment for his phonebanking.  He didn't get money from the party, but that isn't new; there isn't any.  He did get all the support all other statewide candidates get, and I know that I promoted him from the first time we met last Spring.  It wasn't enough, but if we in Denver had had a higher turnout of Democratic voters, that would not have been the case.  We tried, but we failed our statewide candidates in that instance.

[ Parent ]
You Got It All RIGHT
Exactly  You head the nail on the head.
What we can do is make sure in the reorganizing of the Colorado Democratic Party in 2011 that on a county level we elect people that will in turn elect a very competent executive board for the State Party.  We need to makes sure we have people that will enforce the platform we voted on at the State Assembly in 2010 and make sure they are willing to stand up to OFA/DNC  to protect the best interest of the Democrats of Colorado, not their own personal agenda.  We have an amazing grassroots network. I can proudly say Andrew Romanoff's campaign proved that. Thank you!

So who then?
The head of our party currently is none other than a former Mike Miles Democrat who became the person who has screwed the party grassroots over. Who do we possibly know that could be better or won't fall like she did?

[ Parent ]
State and County Chairs Should Rotate Out
A balancing problem with any organization is to keep fresh ideas and people passing through specific leadership positions.  Certainly, the 2005 election of the current leadership slate was a sound decision.  However, this is not an easy, CEO paid position; and people burn out in them.  

I think that we need to constantly be on the lookout for new people in leadership.  New leaders will be found.  Let's hope that they can bring the divergent groups together for the next cycle, as a loss then would be as bad as any in the past.


[ Parent ]
CDP Reorg
Pat Waak has stated she will not be running for CDP Chair in 2011. But what I am afraid of is that she already has someone she wishes to push in. We need a chair and an executive board that actually has some knowledge about Campaigns in Colorado. Not a person that will bow in aye to the DNC. We have several previous Legislatures (that did not get reelected) that might be interested. They know what it's like to not get the support of the party for their reelection. It all starts at the county level and they are the ones that actually get to vote on who becomes the new Chair.
Terra was financed and hired by the DSCC.  
Good example why when you donate you should always donate time, money .... to the CANDIDATE not the organizations.  

Yes, so who?
What all of us need to be doing is talking to the people in our county parties and filling out our executive boards NOW. Not later. For all we know the state exec board could be filled with more cronies already in place.  

[ Parent ]
Get Good People Who Are Willing to Work
The county parties will be electing their representatives to the state and CD Central Committees and Executive Boards next year.  PCP's and other leaders and elected persons will decide on who sits in those seats.  Turnout for reorg and the various committee meetings is no where near as high as it should be.  Good, thinking volunteers who know how the operation works need to be identified between now and Reorg.  It is time to begin that thinking if any had been unaware of its importance.  

[ Parent ]
The Colorado Democratic Party Is a Volunteer Organization
Though your case is strong about the poor leadership and planning for this long-understood-to-be a very difficult election, I think you may have missed something.  The Colorado Democratic Party and the county parties which make it up are volunteer organizations.   As such, a lot of the effort and support in getting our voters to vote falls on our local leadership, made up of volunteers.  Our primary is late which leaves little time to bring disaffected activists to the nominee and give less time for the county party machinery to come together and to approve the slates.  This is complicated by the initiative ballot process which was not firm until late August.  The county parties have to have a meeting of their party leadership which includes precinct committee persons, house and senate district leadership and chairs, county officers and elected officials.  Such meetings have to be public with sufficient notice.  

Prior to that meeting, outreach is done through volunteer precinct committee persons.  Concentrate on the word, "volunteer" and remember that we are in the worst recession in the lifetime of anyone reading this blog. When people lose their jobs, they somehow forget about doing volunteer work.  

Now, consider that the statewide candidates were working with some of the party organizations; but they have minuscule budgets lower than Governor or Senator.  Also, consider just how much money was spent on the primary and its aftermath; this dried up a lot of the donations normally available to down ballot candidates, donations which are used for media and door-to-door coverage.  Though I supported the primary challenges, they became a money sink which made it much more difficult for our down-ballot races.

We, in Denver, managed to bring a lot of our voters to the polls through the efforts of our volunteers and the paid help from the various campaigns.  We asked each voter to "vote all the way down ballot and to oppose the numbered and support the lettered issues on the ballot"; and they did.  Because of this turnout, we saved several state legislature seats and helped to defeat those awful amendments.

Please remember that the Democratic Party within Colorado is not a top-down organization, though some of its funding is channeled through it. Also, remember that your county party can be reformed if needed; but it requires dedicated long term thinking volunteers willing to run for leadership and to use free time in doing so.

Finally, please note, as I have been writing here often, that the down ballot races are those needing support. Only a few thousand more voters casting ballots all the way would have meant a Treasurer Kennedy, a Secretary of State Buescher and an Attorney General Garnett.  Next cycle, please keep that in mind.  


@sain
You are correct, of course.
But can't you tell it's more fun to bitch and complain and create strawmen to skewer than actually do what needs doing?


[ Parent ]
@MADCORP
You are a shameless hack, of course.

[ Parent ]
I know you are but what am I.


[ Parent ]
Watch out there Madco
Steve Harvey gets a little sensitive when you say that.

http://www.squarestate.net/dia...


Senator Buck will give me a great sense of "Buyers Remorse" in the way that it would feel like my Senator was screwing me over.  


[ Parent ]
It's all about
"The Signal-to-Noise Ratio": http://coloradoconfluence.com/...

We're all in this story together; let's write it well.

[ Parent ]
Who says SainDenver didn't do what needed to be done?
Did you ever think the reason this is being brought up now is because everyone was too busy working to get Democrats elected the last few weeks with no time left to blog?

Valid issues deserve valid discussion.  


[ Parent ]
All great points
I have been involved with local parties/organizations for some time - I have a great amount of respect for the people who are willing to work in leadership roles within their area.

I want to be clear that I don't have beef with the volunteers running much of the party -- all of the decisions I discuss in the diary were made by paid staff of the state party -- who don't answer to local leadership in any way.

Now here's a little story I got to tell...


[ Parent ]
@MikeD
We don't know each other, but I have at least as well informed insight into what happened, how decisions were made and why whomever was hired was hired.

And I disagree with your assessment.

Kennedy, Beuscher and Garnett did not lose because they were either mistreated or ignored.  The races for their offices got as much coordinated attention as they have in the past. Obviously it wasn't enough this time.

Don't get me wrong - those campaigns  and others downticket were hurt by other avoidable events.  Just one example: Kennedy got off to a slow start among the core D base back in January because we had to figure out whether she was really running for treasurer or whether she was going to be AR's Lt Gov partner when he switched to Gov.  It was a significant and avoidable distraction.   There were other missteps events that demotivated D's to  work hard for the downticket campaigns or necessarily drew our attention elsewhere.

FWIW, I like Pat Waak and think she has done an admirable job for the times.
As Colorado attempts to move form red now purple to blue, it will take a new kind of organization.

As for Terra paying slow, I heard that too.
I also heard it's being corrected, and I believe both are true.  If you take out the part about Terra, or contact them for a comment, I think CoPols would leave it alone.  Perhaps not, I don't know the people that are CoPols and perhaps relationships to those referenced are making it hard to let it go.  


Madco, that has all the earmarks
of an Grade-A load of C.Y.A. bullshit.  Go back and tell your bosses they need to come up with a better spin story than that. ... January? ... Really? January?  We're talking about GOTV here.

[ Parent ]
The "necessarily drew our attention elsewhere"
is right on.  We had 15 races--15--going in our county; from US Senate down to County Commissioner.  Just how many volunteers does one think were available for the Sec. State, Treasurer and DA races?

There simply weren't enough people or money resources to go around. Trying to make that, and those losses the fault of the Bennet campaign is ludicrous.  


[ Parent ]
what an odd statement
If you don't think we know each other, how would you have any idea if you as equally well informed?

I'll help you out "MADCO" -- I do know who you are, and no -- you're not as well informed as I am.

Now here's a little story I got to tell...


[ Parent ]
I'm tempted to respond in kind to the insults
and name calling I see here.  But will refrain, and give facts and direct observations from my experience.  I worked not for, but closely with, the Bennet GOTV campaign for many months.  I never saw a better organized or harder working crew.  The paid staff were paid, from the beginning.

Your allegation that the campaign did not have a good field operation is simply not true.  

And by the way, the term "coordinated campaign" refers to coordinated FEDERAL campaigns.  Campaign finance laws don't allow mixing of resources with state and local campaigns.  But the Bennet campaign did a better job of helping where they could, legally, than the Obama campaign did in '08.  For instance, some of the Bennet staffers volunteered for local campaigns in their little bit of off time.


When making calls from the coordinated
their scripts said, "We are calling on behalf of Senator Michael Bennet." Only until the last week or so did it change to, "calling on behalf of the Democratic Party."

It was never, "Calling on behalf of Senator Bennet and Congresswoman Markey," etc. All money and all resources from the party went to making sure Bennet stayed in office.

Yes, the coordinated campaign is about federal races. What about the DNC, the State Party, the county parties etc.? Every spare resource was pushed for Bennet.  


[ Parent ]
Absolutely not true
in my county.  I heard those calls being made long before the last week or so.

[ Parent ]
That is not true. At all. n/t


[ Parent ]
Yes -- it is
Listen kid: some of this was fixed closer to the election, but most of it wasn't.  I'm sorry if this diary is hurting your feelings or something, as you seem to be taking it pretty personally, but facts are facts.

Now here's a little story I got to tell...

[ Parent ]
Ha!
Hurt my feelings? Nah. Actually, you made me laugh harder than I have in a long time with your "bad management" quip.

I just happen to disagree with you, strongly, on what you believe are "facts". Maybe not too much, we probably vote the same way.


[ Parent ]
Next Time Take the Initiative
Change the language in the script. It is not holy writ, it's only a guide for a caller who may not have any calling experience.  If the local volunteer leaders or managers don't like it, they can be over-ridden or bypassed.  Next time, when you see something stupid, tell the manager and make the changes within the group of those calling to be sure that a solid, personal message is being delivered.  After all, we are contacting our "neighbors".  

[ Parent ]
you created your handle to respond to this diary I see
you said you didn't work for Bennet, but worked "closely" with them -- Terra strategies by chance?  Or OFA/Colorado United: which also ignored every campaign besides Bennet?

Now here's a little story I got to tell...

[ Parent ]
I am truly laughing out loud!
My goodness, what silliness you display.  When someone disagrees with you, and relates their own observations and experience, you react with insults and personal denigration.
Therefore, your allegations cannot be respected or taken seriously.

I don't get paid for any of my activism.  I'm a volunteer, pure and simple.  Have been doing Dem party work and helping campaigns since back when Howard Dean told me I had the power.

I signed in today because I kinda thought I had the right, same as you, to voice my opinions and knowledge.  So sorry if that upsets you.    


[ Parent ]
I wonder...
I wonder how Kennedy, Buescher, Garnett, Markey, and Salazar, and several state representatives feel about this decision.  While I think most Democrats agree they are glad we are not discussing about Senator Buck, if resources had been more equitably allocated we might be discussing how we have a Dem Governor, Dem AG, Dem Sec of State, and a continued majority in the state house.

"Bennet...squeaked out victory"
"...in large part because a dozen or so Romanoff staffers"."The dems coordinated campaign decided they actually couldn't do field."

Dude, you've got to be fucking kidding me. Here is a tip: separate your beef with Terra Strategies from the work the coordinated field team did. Not paying staffers is indefensible, but so is discrediting the work of field staffers who worked 100+ hours a week to eek out a Bennet win.

 


Well said.
MikeD1970 is obviously looking through a very narrow lens.

[ Parent ]
losing the forest through the trees Rork
The problem was at the head of coordinated -- and the heads of almost every democratic entity in Colorado this year.  There were a lot of hardworking staff from the Bennet campaign; there were also a lot of hard working former Romanoff staffers who created the canvass in the last few weeks.  I said as much in the diary.

The problem with Terra was that they had no idea what they were doing, and if it weren't for "junior" staffers they contracted in, the GOTV effort wouldn't have happened.  The problem with the "coordinated" was that they didn't know anything themselves -- so they hired idiots like Terra.

I'm sure you can relate to incredibly bad management :)

Now here's a little story I got to tell...


[ Parent ]
Well, for what its worth
I'm sorry those people got screwed over by Terra. I heard some grumblings around the 4th. Have they payed yet?

[ Parent ]
There was not one,
repeat . . not one Romanoff "staffer" involved with the Bennet GOTV effort in my region.  And the hardcore Romanoff volunteers did not volunteer to help keep this Senate seat in Dem hands.  A friend, one that I still value, said he would "probably" vote for Bennet, but that was all.  I didn't try to change his mind.  He was determined to hold onto that grudge for dear life.  As you are.

[ Parent ]
We need more great diaries like this on (even if Colorado Pols Deletes Them)
re: "Colorado Democrats went down in flames this year
    in order to elect Bennet."

I agree completely.  Obama did a hell of a disservice to Colorado Dem rank and file when he "stole" the Senate Primary Nomination for Bennet and "split" our party going into a very tough General Election.

Colorado Pols is apparently backed by many of the same party insiders that are behind ProgressNow. Demonizing and censoring Dems who disagree with them seems to be the norm.

Thanks to Fong for keeping it up.

Obama Stole Dems 2010 Senate Primary Nomination for "appointed" Sen. Michael Bennet but 57,497 "UnderVotes" by angry Romanoff progressives nearly Stopped them


Now on to the Denver Mayor Race
So some might think that the Colorado Democratic Party isn't run from the top down. But it's the top that hires the Director for the Coordinated Campaign. It's the top that is part of the hiring force for Executive Director (which is a paid position) There's an executive board that hires other people in the Party. Who do you think hires the Director of the House Majority Project?  or the State Senate Director?  Who went to DC and talked to OFA/DNC about Obama coming to Colorado to fund raise for the primary and the coordinated campaign?  The Volunteers had nothing to do with any of this and most of the County Chairs don't have anything to do with this. Who do you think appoints the DNC representatives, there's two do you know who they are?  Not the Volunteers of the Colorado Democratic Party. So yes we need to elect new leadership in the State Party office. Which has to do with who the lowly Volunteers (that do all the work) elect in their County Parities. Go to all your county party meetings, your house district and precinct meetings. Start NOW. If we have our Precincts ready for 2012 we are way ahead of the game folks.
The Mayor Race. HOW MANY DEMOCRATS does it take to run for Mayor? Get ready the Obama folks have their eyes on ONE. Here's your clue, Which Candidate for Mayor of Denver helped raise millions for Pres. Obama's Campaign in Colorado?
So the volunteers and backbone of Denver Democrats may think they control the party but their decision for Mayor is about to be determined by those same old cronies and  Obama agenda protectors unless you don't let them!!

Squarestate.net is owned by Open Communications Colorado, LLC. and is not responsible for the opinions expressed outside of our own.
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Resources
Online Voter Registration!
Blog Roll
Abandon Your Car
American Indian Movement Colorado
Argusfest
The Bell
Big Media
Colorado Capitol Watch
Colorado Confluence Colorado Ethics Watch
Colorado Independent
Colorado Progressive Jewish News
Coloradopols
Congresspedia
Coyote Gulch
CritterThink
DemNotes
Denver Direct
Denver Voice
El Centro Humanitario
El Seminario
Great Education Colorado
La Voz
Lefty Blogs
Liberal Latina
Mario Solis-Marich
Mariowire
Outta the Cornfield
Pocho Blog
Politics West
Rocky Mountain Activist
Scholars and Rogues
Steam Powered Opinions
TriLakeDems
Ultimate Politics
Union Staff for Union
Democracy

Wash Park Prophet
WeatherDem - the blog
Wide Streets

Get Involved
Deep Green Resistance
Occupy Denver
Occupy Everywhere

What We Listen To
KUNC 91.5 FM
AM 760: Boulder's Progressive Talk
KCFR 1340 AM
KGNU 1390AM or 88.5FM
KRFC 88.9FM
Citizen Radio
MicCheckRadio
Democracy Now!
Progressive Voice
Colorado State Legislature

Reference
CoMaps.org
General Assembly
Prospector
Secretary of State
Tax Tracks
TRACER
WikiLeaks.org

Powered By
SoapBlox



Active Users
Currently 0 user(s) logged on.

SquareState.net is owned by Open Communications Colorado, LLC
Powered by: SoapBlox